Jones Emily P, Wisniewski Jennifer N, Wisniewski Christopher S, Little Joshua W
Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Outcome Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Charleston, USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 20;34(6):1551-1558. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02169-8. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Student engagement with learning material is significantly affected by if, and how, students will be assessed. Despite the influence of assessment technique on student engagement, traditional methods like multiple-choice question examinations are most common despite known limitations. Authentic assessment, an alternative option, is a method that simulates a real-world scenario or problem encountered in practice where students must demonstrate a task or skill or create a product as a final outcome. Authentic assessment methods are better at evaluating competency or skill attainment compared with traditional methods. This report provides tips and examples for incorporating authentic assessment from beginning to end.
学生对学习材料的参与度会受到学生将如何被评估以及是否会被评估的显著影响。尽管评估技术会影响学生的参与度，但像多项选择题考试这样的传统方法尽管存在已知的局限性，却最为常见。真实性评估作为一种替代选择，是一种模拟现实世界场景或实践中遇到的问题的方法，在这种场景中，学生必须展示一项任务或技能，或者最终创造出一个作品。与传统方法相比，真实性评估方法在评估能力或技能掌握方面表现更佳。本报告提供了从头到尾纳入真实性评估的技巧和示例。
