• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索南亚区域合作联盟国家金融包容性、治理与碳排放之间的关系。

Exploring the nexus between financial inclusion, governance, and carbon emissions in SAARC countries.

作者信息

Mehmood Jafir, Jinghan Yang, Wang Jing, Ahmad Maqsood

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China.

School of Accounting and Finance, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Dec 6;10(24):e40985. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40985. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40985
PMID:39759319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11700242/
Abstract

This study examines the impact of financial inclusion (FI) and institutional quality (INSQ) on carbon dioxide (CO) emissions in South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) economies, using data from 2004 to 2022. The hypotheses were tested using a generalized method of moments (GMM) approach. Beside, a robust moment method quantile regression (MM-QR) static model and Granger causality tests were employed to validate the results. The findings indicate that FI indicators, such as bank branches of commercial banks (BOCB) and automated teller machines (ATMs) are positively associated with CO emissions. Similarly, the INSQ has a significant positive impact on CO emissions. Control variables, including foreign direct investment (FDI), financial development (FD), and population growth (PG), are also positively linked to CO emissions, whereas globalization (GI) has a negative impact. Robustness tests confirm that the effects of FI and INSQ on CO emissions vary across economic contexts, with unidirectional causality observed between BOCB and CO and bidirectional causality between ATMs and CO. This study highlights the need for policymakers in SAARC countries to balance their economic development and environmental sustainability. Integrating environmentally friendly technologies and practices into financial and institutional development strategies is essential. Promoting green banking, strengthening environmental regulations, and leveraging globalization for cleaner technologies can help mitigate the adverse effects of FI and INSQ on CO emissions. This study underscores the importance of incorporating environmental considerations into economic and financial policies to achieve sustainable development.

摘要

本研究利用2004年至2022年的数据,考察了金融包容性(FI)和制度质量(INSQ)对南亚区域合作联盟(SAARC)经济体二氧化碳(CO)排放的影响。使用广义矩方法(GMM)对假设进行了检验。此外,还采用了稳健矩方法分位数回归(MM-QR)静态模型和格兰杰因果检验来验证结果。研究结果表明,FI指标,如商业银行的银行分支机构(BOCB)和自动取款机(ATM)与CO排放呈正相关。同样,INSQ对CO排放有显著的正向影响。控制变量,包括外国直接投资(FDI)、金融发展(FD)和人口增长(PG),也与CO排放呈正相关,而全球化(GI)则有负面影响。稳健性检验证实,FI和INSQ对CO排放的影响因经济背景而异,BOCB与CO之间存在单向因果关系,ATM与CO之间存在双向因果关系。本研究强调了SAARC国家政策制定者平衡经济发展和环境可持续性的必要性。将环保技术和做法纳入金融和制度发展战略至关重要。推广绿色银行、加强环境法规以及利用全球化获取更清洁的技术,有助于减轻FI和INSQ对CO排放的不利影响。本研究强调了将环境因素纳入经济和金融政策以实现可持续发展的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/11700242/2fee902630a9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/11700242/02fcae7af51c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/11700242/2fee902630a9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/11700242/02fcae7af51c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/11700242/2fee902630a9/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the nexus between financial inclusion, governance, and carbon emissions in SAARC countries.探索南亚区域合作联盟国家金融包容性、治理与碳排放之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 6;10(24):e40985. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40985. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
2
Exploring the dynamic relationship between financial development, renewable energy, and carbon emissions: A new evidence from belt and road countries.探索金融发展、可再生能源和碳排放之间的动态关系:来自“一带一路”国家的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(10):14930-14947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16641-0. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Causality analysis of CO emissions, foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, and energy consumption: empirical evidence from South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries.CO 排放、外国直接投资、国内生产总值和能源消费的因果关系分析:来自南亚区域合作联盟(SAARC)国家的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):65684-65698. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20362-3. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
4
Are globalization, urbanization, and energy consumption cause carbon emissions in SAARC region? New evidence from CS-ARDL approach.全球化、城市化和能源消费是否导致了南盟地区的碳排放?来自 CS-ARDL 方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87746-87763. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21835-1. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: evidence from SAARC countries.评估经济开放对环境的影响:来自南盟国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):24542-24551. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05750-6. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Do financial development, financial stability and renewable energy disturb carbon emissions? Evidence from asia-pacific economic cooperation economics.金融发展、金融稳定与可再生能源会扰乱碳排放吗?来自亚太经合组织经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(35):83198-83213. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28418-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
Exploring the mediating role of financial inclusion in the relationship between economic policy uncertainty and CO2 emissions: A global perspective.探讨金融包容在经济政策不确定性与二氧化碳排放关系中的中介作用:全球视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(34):46965-46978. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33954-y. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Environmental effects of ICT diffusion, energy consumption, financial development, and globalization: panel evidence from SAARC economies.信息通信技术扩散、能源消耗、金融发展和全球化对环境的影响:来自南盟经济体的面板证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):38349-38362. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-25049-3. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Quantile relationship between globalization, financial development, economic growth, and carbon emissions: evidence from Vietnam.全球化、金融发展、经济增长与碳排放之间的分位数关系:来自越南的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60098-60116. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20126-z. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
The governance factor: Mitigating carbon emissions through FDI and financial development in emerging Asian economies.治理因素:通过外国直接投资和金融发展缓解新兴亚洲经济体的碳排放。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121740. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121740. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
When do climate change legislation and clean energy policies matter for net-zero emissions?气候变化立法和清洁能源政策何时对净零排放至关重要?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120275. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120275. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Relationship between financial inclusion and carbon emissions: International evidence.金融包容性与碳排放之间的关系:国际证据。
Heliyon. 2023 May 23;9(6):e16472. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16472. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Role of financial inclusion and export diversification in determining green growth: evidence from SAARC economies.
金融包容性和出口多样化在决定绿色增长中的作用:来自南盟经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60327-60340. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20096-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Impact of financial inclusion and human capital on environmental quality: evidence from emerging economies.金融包容性和人力资本对环境质量的影响:来自新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33033-33045. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17945-x. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
The trade-off between economic performance and environmental quality: does financial inclusion matter for emerging Asian economies?经济表现与环境质量之间的权衡:金融包容性对亚洲新兴经济体重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(20):29746-29755. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17755-1. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
When would the dark clouds of financial inclusion be over, and the environment becomes clean? The role of national governance.金融包容的乌云何时散去,环境变得清洁?国家治理的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):27651-27663. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17683-0. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Impact of financial inclusion and infrastructure on ecological footprint in OECD economies.经合组织经济体金融包容性和基础设施对生态足迹的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):21891-21898. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17429-y. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
8
Does financial inclusion and education limit CO2 emissions in China? A new perspective.金融包容性和教育是否限制了中国的二氧化碳排放?一个新视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):18452-18459. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17032-1. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Examining the role of financial inclusion towards CO2 emissions: presenting the role of renewable energy and globalization in the context of EKC.考察金融包容对二氧化碳排放的作用:在 EKC 框架下展示可再生能源和全球化的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):15946-15954. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16898-5. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
10
Financial inclusion-environmental degradation nexus in OIC countries: new evidence from environmental Kuznets curve using DCCE approach.OIC 国家金融包容性与环境恶化的关系:基于 DCCE 方法的环境库兹涅茨曲线的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5360-5377. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15941-9. Epub 2021 Aug 21.