Links Anne R, Perrin Eliana M, Polk Sarah, Konduru Divya, Meraj Shafkat, Showell Nakiya N, Grieb Suzanne M, Hughes Helen
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Telemed Rep. 2024 Dec 9;5(1):380-392. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2024.0028. eCollection 2024.
To qualitatively explore Medicaid-enrolled parents' and young adult patients' perspectives and experiences with telemedicine in pediatric primary care.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to explore their experiences with telemedicine. Participants consisted of English- and Spanish-speaking parents and young adults (18-21) who engaged in a telemedicine visit between March 15, 2021 and December 31, 2022 at two pediatric primary care clinics whose patients are predominantly insured by Medicaid. A qualitative descriptive design was used to develop a taxonomy. Frequencies were obtained to identify the most prevalent themes.
Twenty-six participants (22 parents, 4 young adults) were interviewed. Twelve (46%) participants were English-speaking and 14 (53%) were Spanish-speaking. Four domains were identified, each further classified into themes: pre-visit expectations (option for in-person visit, general anticipation, and specific worries), visit experience (general sentiment, technology, and quality of care), comfort (with overall process, privacy, and communication), and feelings about telemedicine (advantages, disadvantages, and loss of telemedicine). Although many participants had negative expectations of telemedicine prior to their appointment, a majority indicated positive experiences with visits and concerns about a possible future where telemedicine visits at home were no longer covered by their health insurance.
Most participants indicated positive experiences with telemedicine and perceived negative impact if access was removed. Findings related to perceived quality of care, advantages, and disadvantages suggest that patient preferences and individual circumstances should be taken into account when choosing visit modality in similar settings.
定性探索参加医疗补助计划的父母和年轻成年患者对儿科初级保健中远程医疗的看法和体验。
我们对参与者进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们的远程医疗体验。参与者包括讲英语和西班牙语的父母以及年轻成年人(18至21岁),他们在2021年3月15日至2022年12月31日期间在两家儿科初级保健诊所进行了远程医疗就诊,这些诊所的患者主要由医疗补助计划承保。采用定性描述性设计来制定分类法。通过频率统计来确定最普遍的主题。
共访谈了26名参与者(22名父母,4名年轻成年人)。12名(46%)参与者讲英语,14名(53%)讲西班牙语。确定了四个领域,每个领域进一步细分为多个主题:就诊前期望(面对面就诊选择、总体预期和具体担忧)、就诊体验(总体感受、技术和护理质量)、舒适度(对整个过程、隐私和沟通的感受)以及对远程医疗的看法(优点、缺点和远程医疗的缺失)。尽管许多参与者在预约前对远程医疗抱有负面期望,但大多数人表示就诊体验良好,并担心未来可能出现远程家庭就诊不再由医疗保险覆盖的情况。
大多数参与者表示远程医疗体验良好,并认为取消远程医疗服务会产生负面影响。与感知到的护理质量、优点和缺点相关的研究结果表明,在类似情况下选择就诊方式时应考虑患者的偏好和个人情况。