Jessica Sousa (
Andrew Smith, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Chicago, Illinois.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Sep;42(9):1275-1282. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00487.
It is not known how the growth of telehealth has affected patients' choice of visit modalities (telehealth versus in person). In 2023 we conducted a mixed-methods study that paired a nationally representative survey of 2,071 adults (including 571 who used behavioral health services) and semistructured interviews with twenty-six people with depression or bipolar disorder. We explored patients' experiences with visit modality selection and their agency in the decision. Approximately one-third of patients receiving therapy or medication visits reported that their clinicians did not offer both modalities. Thirty-two percent reported that they did not typically receive their preferred modality, and 45 percent did not believe that their clinician considered their modality preferences. Qualitative findings revealed that some clinicians did not elicit patients' modality preferences. Perceived lack of choice affected satisfaction and rapport with clinicians and encouraged some people to seek care elsewhere. These findings highlight trade-offs in policies to preserve patient choice and approaches that clinicians can take to identify and accommodate patients' preferences.
尚不清楚远程医疗的发展如何影响了患者对就诊方式(远程医疗与面对面)的选择。2023 年,我们进行了一项混合方法研究,对 2071 名成年人(包括 571 名使用行为健康服务的成年人)进行了全国代表性调查,并对 26 名患有抑郁症或双相情感障碍的人进行了半结构化访谈。我们探讨了患者在就诊方式选择方面的体验以及他们在决策中的自主权。约三分之一接受治疗或药物治疗的患者报告说,他们的临床医生没有提供这两种就诊方式。32%的人报告说他们通常没有得到他们喜欢的就诊方式,45%的人认为他们的临床医生没有考虑他们的就诊方式偏好。定性研究结果表明,一些临床医生没有询问患者的就诊方式偏好。缺乏选择的感觉会影响他们对临床医生的满意度和融洽度,并促使一些人到其他地方寻求治疗。这些发现强调了在保留患者选择权的政策和临床医生可以采取的识别和满足患者偏好的方法之间存在权衡。