Martynenko Nataliia
Department of Law and Public Administration, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31, Povitroflotsky Avenue, Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Feb 18;10:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100578. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The article examines the process of digitalisation of forensic expert activity through the prism of the State's policy aimed at creating a technologically advanced society. Proposals are made: on registration and identification of forensic experts of state specialised institutions in the Unified Judiciary Information Telecommunication System; on improvement of the functions of the Register of Certified Forensic Experts regarding the profile of a legal entity carrying out forensic activities and the profile of an individual forensic expert. A number of legislative amendments related to the field of forensic science have been proposed to ensure a balanced development of the Register of Certified Forensic Experts. The introduction of the Forensic Expert e-Diary will facilitate the maintenance of the Register of Certified Forensic Experts in terms of displaying the number of expert examinations conducted by each forensic expert and the level of their workload based on the number of examinations and their complexity, calculated in expert hours. It is proved that the Register of Certified Forensic Experts should be maintained in such a way that the profiles of employed experts are displayed and made available via the profile of their expert organisation. It is concluded that in order to ensure independence, objectivity, efficiency, and speed of forensic examinations, it is advisable to introduce the following model of automated appointment of an expert to conduct a particular study: the system pre-selects several candidates, after which the court selects from the list an expert who can be involved in the work. The article also raises the issues of information security and data confidentiality in the organisation of forensic expert activity.
本文通过国家旨在创建技术先进社会的政策视角，审视了法医专家活动的数字化进程。提出了以下建议：关于国家专门机构的法医专家在统一司法信息电信系统中的登记和识别；关于改进注册法医专家登记册在开展法医活动的法人简介和个体法医专家简介方面的功能。已提出一些与法医学领域相关的立法修正案，以确保注册法医专家登记册的平衡发展。法医专家电子日记的引入将有助于维护注册法医专家登记册，以便显示每位法医专家进行的专家鉴定数量以及根据鉴定数量及其复杂性（以专家小时计算）得出的工作量水平。事实证明，注册法医专家登记册应以这样的方式维护，即在职专家的简介通过其专家组织的简介进行展示并可供查阅。得出的结论是，为确保法医鉴定的独立性、客观性、效率和速度，宜引入以下专家自动指定进行特定研究的模式：系统预先选择若干候选人，然后由法院从名单中挑选可参与工作的专家。本文还提出了法医专家活动组织中的信息安全和数据保密问题。
