Suppr超能文献

诺贝尔奖的真相:赫尔曼·穆勒是如何获得诺贝尔奖的:优生学的幌子。

The unraveling of a Nobel Prize: How Hermann Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize: A front for eugenics.

作者信息

Calabrese Edward J, Shamoun Dima Yazji

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Morrill I-N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.

Finance Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2025 Mar;22(3):149-168. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2024.2440558. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Abstract

This paper asserts that the Nobel Prize for Medicine/Physiology that Hermann J. Muller received in 1946 was a front to enhance the legitimacy, acceptance, and application of eugenics, a strategy to guide the direction and rate of human evolutionary change. Seven of the nine people nominating (1932-1946) Muller were proponents of eugenics with Muller being among the most visible of the scientific leaders. Muller's nominators never cited his Nobel Prize research in scientific literature, lacked expertise in radiation-induced mutations, and were not qualified to evaluate Muller's research. Muller's claim of induced "gene" mutations with extremely high radiation dose rates remained highly uncertain, undercutting legitimate Nobel Prize consideration. Despite their diverse range of educational, research, and political backgrounds, they nominated Muller based on the convergence of their respective eugenic ideologies. The Chair of the Nobel Prize committee not only was a committed eugenicist but also nominated Muller the previous year and had invited these nominators under the belief they would support his prolonged advocacy for Muller. While the underlying intent of the nominations was to associate extremely high scientific achievement with eugenics, the Prize was ironically awarded immediately after World War II, and eugenics would be profoundly stigmatized due to its association with horrific actions against humanity by the Nazis. However, Muller's Nobel Prize became a fear-based lightning rod for the environmental revolution, inspiring the book (1962), and providing the central framework for cancer risk assessment by regulatory agencies worldwide.

摘要

本文断言,赫尔曼·J·穆勒在1946年获得的诺贝尔生理学或医学奖是为了提升优生学的合法性、认可度和应用而采取的一种手段,优生学是一种引导人类进化变革方向和速度的策略。在提名穆勒的九个人中(1932年至1946年),有七人是优生学的支持者,穆勒是最知名的科学领袖之一。穆勒的提名者从未在科学文献中引用过他的诺贝尔奖研究成果,缺乏辐射诱导突变方面的专业知识,也没有资格评估穆勒的研究。穆勒关于在极高辐射剂量率下诱导“基因”突变的说法仍然极不确定,这削弱了对其获得诺贝尔奖的合理考量。尽管他们在教育、研究和政治背景方面各不相同,但他们基于各自优生学理念的趋同而提名了穆勒。诺贝尔奖委员会主席不仅是一位坚定的优生学家,而且前一年还提名了穆勒,并且在认为这些提名者会支持他对穆勒的长期倡导的情况下邀请了他们。虽然提名的潜在意图是将极高的科学成就与优生学联系起来,但具有讽刺意味的是,该奖项在第二次世界大战后立即颁发,而优生学由于与纳粹对人类的可怕行为联系在一起而受到了深刻的污名化。然而,穆勒的诺贝尔奖成为了环境革命中基于恐惧的避雷针,激发了《(1962年)》这本书,并为全球监管机构进行癌症风险评估提供了核心框架。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验