Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Muller's nobel prize research and peer review.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Oct 19;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0066-z.
2
Was Muller's 1946 Nobel Prize research for radiation-induced gene mutations peer-reviewed?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Jun 6;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0060-5.
3
Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.
Toxicol Sci. 2012 Mar;126(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr338. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
5
6
Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment.
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:773-788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Confirmation that Hermann Muller was dishonest in his Nobel Prize Lecture.
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Nov;97(11):2999-3003. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03566-5. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
9
Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?
Arch Toxicol. 2011 Dec;85(12):1495-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0728-8. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
10
Muller's Nobel Prize data: Getting the dose wrong and its significance.
Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108528. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108528. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Historical view of the effects of radiation on cancer cells.
Oncol Rev. 2025 Apr 30;19:1527742. doi: 10.3389/or.2025.1527742. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Natural Ionizing Radiation on Health Indicators in Region with Monazite Sand in Brazil.
World J Nucl Med. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):31-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791695. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Ethics of Adoption and Use of the Linear No-Threshold Model.
Dose Response. 2019 Jan 10;17(1):1559325818822602. doi: 10.1177/1559325818822602. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Was Muller's 1946 Nobel Prize research for radiation-induced gene mutations peer-reviewed?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Jun 6;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0060-5.
3
Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment.
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:773-788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:435-451. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
6
On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith.
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
An abuse of risk assessment: how regulatory agencies improperly adopted LNT for cancer risk assessment.
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Apr;89(4):647-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1454-4. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
8
Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.
Toxicol Sci. 2012 Mar;126(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr338. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
9
Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?
Arch Toxicol. 2011 Dec;85(12):1495-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0728-8. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
10
ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE.
Science. 1927 Jul 22;66(1699):84-7. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1699.84.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验