• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医院中人工智能和预测模型的当前应用与评估

Current Use And Evaluation Of Artificial Intelligence And Predictive Models In US Hospitals.

作者信息

Nong Paige, Adler-Milstein Julia, Apathy Nate C, Holmgren A Jay, Everson Jordan

机构信息

Paige Nong (

Julia Adler-Milstein, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Jan;44(1):90-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00842.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00842
PMID:39761454
Abstract

Effective evaluation and governance of predictive models used in health care, particularly those driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, are needed to ensure that models are fair, appropriate, valid, effective, and safe, or FAVES. We analyzed data from the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement to identify how AI and predictive models are used and evaluated for accuracy and bias in hospitals. Hospitals use AI and predictive models to predict health trajectories or risks for inpatients, identify high-risk outpatients to inform follow-up care, monitor health, recommend treatments, simplify or automate billing procedures, and facilitate scheduling. We found that 65 percent of US hospitals used predictive models, and 79 percent of those used models from their electronic health record developer. Sixty-one percent of hospitals that used models evaluated them for accuracy using data from their health system (local evaluation), but only 44 percent reported local evaluation for bias. Hospitals that developed their own predictive models, had high operating margins, and were health system members were more likely to report local evaluation. Policy and programs that provide technical support, tools to assess FAVES principles, and educational resources would help ensure that all hospitals can use predictive models safely and prevent a new organizational digital divide in AI.

摘要

为确保预测模型公平、恰当、有效、有用且安全(即FAVES),需要对医疗保健中使用的预测模型,尤其是那些由人工智能(AI)和机器学习驱动的模型进行有效评估和治理。我们分析了2023年美国医院协会年度调查信息技术补充资料中的数据,以确定医院如何使用AI和预测模型,以及如何对其准确性和偏差进行评估。医院使用AI和预测模型来预测住院患者的健康轨迹或风险,识别高风险门诊患者以提供后续护理指导,监测健康状况,推荐治疗方案,简化或自动化计费程序,并促进日程安排。我们发现,65%的美国医院使用了预测模型,其中79%使用了来自其电子健康记录开发商的模型。使用模型的医院中,61%使用其医疗系统的数据(本地评估)对模型的准确性进行了评估,但只有44%报告对偏差进行了本地评估。开发自己的预测模型、营业利润率高且是医疗系统成员的医院更有可能报告进行了本地评估。提供技术支持、评估FAVES原则的工具和教育资源的政策和计划将有助于确保所有医院都能安全地使用预测模型,并防止在AI领域出现新的组织性数字鸿沟。

相似文献

1
Current Use And Evaluation Of Artificial Intelligence And Predictive Models In US Hospitals.美国医院中人工智能和预测模型的当前应用与评估
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Jan;44(1):90-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00842.
2
Hospital Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Adoption by Neighborhood Deprivation.社区贫困状况对医院采用人工智能/机器学习的影响
Med Care. 2025 Mar 1;63(3):227-233. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Implementing an artificial intelligence command centre in the NHS: a mixed-methods study.在英国国家医疗服务体系中实施人工智能指挥中心:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(41):1-108. doi: 10.3310/TATM3277.
4
Predictive Modeling Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms on Electronic Health Record Data: Advantages and Challenges.基于电子健康记录数据的人工智能和机器学习算法的预测建模:优势与挑战。
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Oct;39(4):647-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.赋予护士权力,倡导健康公平并做到公平公正:消除医疗保健中人工智能的偏见,实现公平且负责任的人工智能。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):130-139. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: A scoping review.用于乳腺癌检测的人工智能及其健康技术评估:一项范围综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jan;184:109391. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109391. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology.关于人工智能在内窥镜检查中的当前应用情况、解决障碍以及推动胃肠病学领域人工智能发展的共识声明。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):2-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
A Machine Learning Approach with Human-AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.一种人机协作的机器学习方法用于患者安全事件报告的自动分类:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 25;11:e53378. doi: 10.2196/53378.
10
Future Medical Artificial Intelligence Application Requirements and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.德国大学医院的未来医学人工智能应用要求和医生期望:基于网络的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 5;23(3):e26646. doi: 10.2196/26646.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an AI Governance Framework for Safe and Responsible AI in Health Care Organizations: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.为医疗保健组织中安全且负责任的人工智能制定人工智能治理框架:一项多方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 28;14:e75702. doi: 10.2196/75702.
2
Adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare: survey of health system priorities, successes, and challenges.医疗保健领域人工智能的应用:卫生系统优先事项、成功案例及挑战的调查
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1093-1100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf065.
3
The urgency of centering safety-net organizations in AI governance.
将安全网组织置于人工智能治理核心的紧迫性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 21;8(1):117. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01479-4.
4
Patients' Trust in Health Systems to Use Artificial Intelligence.患者对医疗系统使用人工智能的信任。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460628. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60628.