• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为医疗保健组织中安全且负责任的人工智能制定人工智能治理框架:一项多方法研究的方案

Developing an AI Governance Framework for Safe and Responsible AI in Health Care Organizations: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.

作者信息

Freeman Sam, Wang Amy, Saraf Sudeep, Potts Erica, McKimm Amy, Coiera Enrico, Magrabi Farah

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 28;14:e75702. doi: 10.2196/75702.

DOI:10.2196/75702
PMID:40720809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health care delivery through enhanced diagnostics, streamlined operations, and predictive analytics. However, health care organizations face substantial challenges in implementing AI safely and responsibly. This is due to regulatory complexity, ethical considerations, and a lack of practical governance frameworks. While many theoretical frameworks exist, few have been tested or adapted for real-world application in health care settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and validate a practical AI governance framework to support the safe and responsible use of AI in health care organizations. The specific objectives are to identify governance requirements for AI in health care, examine existing AI governance processes and best practices, codevelop an AI governance framework to meet the needs of health care organizations, and test and refine the framework through real-world application.

METHODS

A multimethod research design will be used, comprising four key stages: (1) a scoping review and document analysis to identify governance needs and current processes, (2) in-depth interviews with health care stakeholders as well as national and international AI governance experts, (3) development of a draft AI governance framework through a synthesis of findings, and (4) validation and refinement of the framework through stakeholder workshops and application to case studies of AI tools. Data will be analyzed using qualitative methods informed by grounded theory.

RESULTS

The project received funding in October 2023. Ethics approval was obtained from the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (project 171/24) and the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (project 16508). Data collection commenced in April 2024, with the scoping review and document analysis being finalized. As of March 2025, a total of 43 interviews have been completed. The final AI governance framework is expected to be completed and ready for dissemination by June 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will deliver a comprehensive AI governance framework co-designed with health care stakeholders to address real-world challenges in AI oversight. The framework will offer practical guidance to support health care organizations in adopting AI technologies safely, ethically, and in alignment with regulatory requirements. Outcomes from this study will inform local and international discussions on AI governance and promote the responsible integration of AI in health systems.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/75702.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)有潜力通过增强诊断、简化操作和预测分析来改善医疗服务的提供。然而,医疗保健组织在安全且负责任地实施人工智能方面面临重大挑战。这是由于监管的复杂性、伦理考量以及缺乏实用的治理框架。虽然存在许多理论框架,但很少有经过测试或适用于医疗保健环境中的实际应用。

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证一个实用的人工智能治理框架,以支持医疗保健组织安全且负责任地使用人工智能。具体目标是确定医疗保健领域人工智能的治理要求,审视现有的人工智能治理流程和最佳实践,共同开发一个满足医疗保健组织需求的人工智能治理框架,并通过实际应用对该框架进行测试和完善。

方法

将采用多方法研究设计,包括四个关键阶段:(1)进行范围审查和文件分析,以确定治理需求和当前流程;(2)对医疗保健利益相关者以及国家和国际人工智能治理专家进行深入访谈;(3)通过综合研究结果制定人工智能治理框架草案;(4)通过利益相关者研讨会以及将其应用于人工智能工具的案例研究来验证和完善该框架。将使用基于扎根理论的定性方法对数据进行分析。

结果

该项目于2023年10月获得资金。已获得阿尔弗雷德健康人类研究伦理委员会(项目171/24)和麦考瑞大学人类研究伦理委员会(项目16508)的伦理批准。数据收集于2024年4月开始,范围审查和文件分析已完成。截至2025年3月,共完成了43次访谈。最终的人工智能治理框架预计将于2025年6月完成并准备好进行传播。

结论

本研究将提供一个与医疗保健利益相关者共同设计的全面人工智能治理框架,以应对人工智能监管中的实际挑战。该框架将提供实用指导,以支持医疗保健组织安全、符合伦理且符合监管要求地采用人工智能技术。本研究的结果将为关于人工智能治理的国内外讨论提供参考,并促进人工智能在卫生系统中的负责任整合。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/75702。

相似文献

1
Developing an AI Governance Framework for Safe and Responsible AI in Health Care Organizations: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.为医疗保健组织中安全且负责任的人工智能制定人工智能治理框架:一项多方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 28;14:e75702. doi: 10.2196/75702.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Innovations, Diagnosis, and Implications.医学问卷中的人工智能:创新、诊断及影响
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e72398. doi: 10.2196/72398.
4
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Vaccine Equity: Protocol for Exploring Vaccine Distribution Planning and Scheduling in Pandemics in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.人工智能在疫苗公平性方面的伦理影响:探索低收入和中等收入国家大流行期间疫苗分配规划与调度的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 9;14:e76634. doi: 10.2196/76634.
5
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
6
Expectations and Requirements of Surgical Staff for an AI-Supported Clinical Decision Support System for Older Patients: Qualitative Study.外科医护人员对用于老年患者的人工智能支持临床决策支持系统的期望与要求:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 17;7:e57899. doi: 10.2196/57899.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
9
Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.老年人社会护理对话系统:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 10;14:e72310. doi: 10.2196/72310.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

本文引用的文献

1
Launching the Trustworthy and Responsible AI Network (TRAIN): A Consortium to Facilitate Safe and Effective AI Adoption.启动可信且负责的人工智能网络(TRAIN):一个促进安全有效采用人工智能的联盟。
JAMA. 2025 May 6;333(17):1481-1482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.1331.
2
Current Use And Evaluation Of Artificial Intelligence And Predictive Models In US Hospitals.美国医院中人工智能和预测模型的当前应用与评估
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Jan;44(1):90-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00842.
3
Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre.
通过 NASSS 框架理解人工智能在医疗保健组织和系统中的整合:在加拿大领先的学术中心进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x.
4
Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review.随机对照试验评估人工智能在临床实践中的应用:范围综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 May;6(5):e367-e373. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5.
5
Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance.生成式人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用、整合和治理:基于实施科学的转化途径。
Implement Sci. 2024 Mar 15;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01357-9.
6
Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings.当代临床信息系统中的自动化:医疗环境中的人工智能调查。
Yearb Med Inform. 2023 Aug;32(1):115-126. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768733. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
Factors governing the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare providers.影响医疗服务提供者采用人工智能的因素。
Discov Health Syst. 2022;1(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s44250-022-00004-8. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
8
Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines.健康系统规模的语言模型是通用的预测引擎。
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7969):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06160-y. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
More than algorithms: an analysis of safety events involving ML-enabled medical devices reported to the FDA.超越算法:对 FDA 报告的涉及机器学习医疗器械的安全事件的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1227-1236. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad065.
10
Evidence synthesis, digital scribes, and translational challenges for artificial intelligence in healthcare.医疗保健中人工智能的证据综合、数字记录员和转化挑战。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Dec 20;3(12):100860. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100860. Epub 2022 Dec 12.