• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过临床风险快速跟踪来优化等待经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者等待名单的自动化方法:SWIFT TAVR算法

An automated method of streamlining waiting list by clinical risk fast-tracking for patients awaiting TAVR: SWIFT TAVR algorithm.

作者信息

Khan Sarosh, Demir Ozan, Mehmood Muhammad, Nabi Ibraheam, Kharoud Damandeep, Crawford Iveta, Smith Sheila, Fawaz Samer, Sajjad Uzma, Xue Qiang, Singh Arvind, Karamasis Grigoris V, Keeble Thomas, Davies John, Kabir Alamgir, Aggarwal Rajesh, Jagathesan Rohan, Cook Christopher

机构信息

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, Essex, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine & MTRC, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom.

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, Essex, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine & MTRC, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;422:132952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132952. Epub 2025 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132952
PMID:39761831
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly in demand for treating severe aortic stenosis in a variety of surgical risk profiles. This means increasing wait times and elevated morbidity and mortality on the waitlist. To address this, we developed the SWIFT TAVR algorithm to prioritize patients based on clinical risk and reduce wait times.

METHODS

The SWIFT algorithm, implemented in Microsoft Excel, calculates a clinical risk score from three parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), peak aortic valve gradient, and syncope. Scores categorize patients into four prioritisation profiles: high (9-10 points), intermediate (4-8 points), low (2-3 points), and minimal (0-1 point). The study prospectively applied the SWIFT algorithm to patients in 2022 (SWIFT group) and retrospectively to a 2021 cohort (CONTROL group). Outcomes measured were wait times from consultation to procedure and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) while awaiting TAVR.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were included (117 SWIFT, 111 CONTROL). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups (p > 0.05). Overall wait times were significantly shorter in the SWIFT group (21 vs 28 weeks, p < 0.001), particularly for high-risk patients (12 vs 31 weeks, p < 0.001). MACE rates were similar (9 % vs 10 %, p = 0.722).

DISCUSSION

The SWIFT algorithm significantly reduced wait times, particularly for high-risk patients, without increasing MACE rates. This automated, risk-based prioritisation tool improves equity and efficiency in TAVR waitlist management and is globally applicable. Further randomized studies are warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

引言

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)在治疗各种手术风险状况的严重主动脉瓣狭窄方面的需求日益增加。这意味着等待时间延长,以及等待名单上的发病率和死亡率上升。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了SWIFT TAVR算法,根据临床风险对患者进行优先排序,以减少等待时间。

方法

在Microsoft Excel中实施的SWIFT算法根据三个参数计算临床风险评分:左心室射血分数(LVEF)、主动脉瓣峰值梯度和晕厥。分数将患者分为四个优先排序类别:高(9 - 10分)、中(4 - 8分)、低(2 - 3分)和极低(0 - 1分)。该研究前瞻性地将SWIFT算法应用于2022年的患者(SWIFT组),并回顾性地应用于2021年的队列(对照组)。测量的结果是从咨询到手术的等待时间以及等待TAVR期间的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。

结果

共纳入228例患者(117例SWIFT组,111例对照组)。两组之间的基线特征无显著差异(p > 0.05)。SWIFT组的总体等待时间显著更短(21周对28周,p < 0.001),特别是高危患者(12周对31周,p < 0.001)。MACE发生率相似(9%对10%,p = 0.722)。

讨论

SWIFT算法显著减少了等待时间,特别是对于高危患者,且未增加MACE发生率。这种基于风险的自动优先排序工具提高了TAVR等待名单管理的公平性和效率,并且在全球范围内都适用。有必要进行进一步的随机研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
An automated method of streamlining waiting list by clinical risk fast-tracking for patients awaiting TAVR: SWIFT TAVR algorithm.一种通过临床风险快速跟踪来优化等待经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者等待名单的自动化方法:SWIFT TAVR算法
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;422:132952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132952. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
2
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Impact of procedural capacity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement wait times and outcomes: a study of regional variation in Ontario, Canada.手术能力对经导管主动脉瓣置换术等待时间和治疗结果的影响:加拿大安大略省地区差异研究
Open Heart. 2020 May;7(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001241.
4
Temporal Trends and Clinical Consequences of Wait Times for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Population-Based Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术等待时间的时间趋势和临床后果:基于人群的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jul 31;138(5):483-493. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033432.
5
Association Between Wait Time for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Early Postprocedural Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术等待时间与早期术后结局的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):e010407. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010407.
6
Cardiac catheterization, coronary intervention, and wait times for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.心导管检查、冠状动脉介入治疗和经导管主动脉瓣置换术的等待时间。
Coron Artery Dis. 2023 Nov 1;34(7):475-482. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001275. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Comparison of Short and Mid-Term Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (Intermediate/High Risk) Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.对比行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(中危/高危)患者的短期及中期死亡率和发病率。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Apr 15;23(2):E212-E220. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2913.
8
Echocardiographic determinants of LV functional improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室功能改善的超声心动图决定因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1164-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26302. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
9
Impact of wait times on late postprocedural mortality after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后成功后等待时间对晚期术后死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 8;12(1):5967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09995-z.
10
1-Year Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Italian OBSERVANT Study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术 1 年的结果:意大利 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 18;66(7):804-812. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.013.