Yanez-Perez Roraima, Garcia-Cabello Eloy, Habich Annegret, Cedres Nira, Diaz-Galvan Patricia, Abdelnour Carla, Toledo Jon B, Barroso José, Ferreira Daniel
Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84946-4.
Cognition plays a central role in the diagnosis and characterization of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). However, the complex associations among cognitive deficits in different domains in DLB are largely unknown. To characterize these associations, we investigated and compared the cognitive connectome of DLB patients, healthy controls (HC), and Alzheimer's disease patients (AD). We obtained data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. We built cognitive connectomes for DLB (n = 104), HC (n = 3703), and AD (n = 1985) using correlations among 24 cognitive measures mapping multiple cognitive domains. Connectomes were compared using global and nodal graph measures of centrality, integration, and segregation. For global measures, DLB showed a higher global efficiency (integration) and lower transitivity (segregation) than HC and AD. For nodal measures, DLB showed higher global efficiency in most measures, higher participation (centrality) in free-recall memory, processing speed/attention, and executive measures, and lower local efficiency (segregation) than HC. Compared with AD, DLB showed lower nodal strength and local efficiency, especially in memory consolidation. The cognitive connectome of DLB shows a loss of segregation, leading to a loss of cognitive specialization. This study provides the data to advance the understanding of cognitive impairment and clinical phenotype in DLB, with implications for differential diagnosis.
认知在路易体痴呆(DLB)的诊断和特征描述中起着核心作用。然而,DLB不同领域认知缺陷之间的复杂关联在很大程度上尚不清楚。为了描述这些关联,我们研究并比较了DLB患者、健康对照(HC)和阿尔茨海默病患者(AD)的认知连接组。我们从国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心获取数据。我们使用映射多个认知领域的24项认知测量之间的相关性,构建了DLB(n = 104)、HC(n = 3703)和AD(n = 1985)的认知连接组。使用中心性、整合和分离的全局和节点图测量来比较连接组。对于全局测量,与HC和AD相比,DLB显示出更高的全局效率(整合)和更低的传递性(分离)。对于节点测量,在大多数测量中,DLB显示出更高的全局效率,在自由回忆记忆、处理速度/注意力和执行测量方面具有更高的参与度(中心性),并且与HC相比具有更低的局部效率(分离)。与AD相比,DLB显示出更低的节点强度和局部效率,尤其是在记忆巩固方面。DLB的认知连接组显示出分离的丧失,导致认知专业化的丧失。本研究提供的数据有助于推进对DLB认知障碍和临床表型的理解,对鉴别诊断具有重要意义。