Suppr超能文献

评估意识指数(IoC)作为全身麻醉诱导期间环丙泊酚镇静效果监测工具的应用:一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Assessing the use of the Index of Consciousness (IoC) as a monitoring tool for the sedative effects of ciprofol during general anesthesia induction: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Yu Yanhong, Wang Hao, Wei Liguo, Gao Yifan, Yan Nuo, Chu Jing, Li Hong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force (PAP), Tianjin, China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Jan 6;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00484-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the consistency and accuracy of the Index of Consciousness (IoC) and the Bispectral Index (BIS) in monitoring the sedative effect of ciprofol during the induction of general anesthesia. There is extensive literature that reports good consistency and correlations between the IoC1 and the BIS in reflecting the sedation levels induced by propofol and sevoflurane but not by ciprofol.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the consistency and accuracy of the IoC and BIS in monitoring the sedative effect of ciprofol during the induction of general anesthesia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study. A total of 130 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent noncardiac or noncranial elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. All patients were diligently monitored for both the BIS and IoC. IoC1 and BIS values were recorded at eight specific time points (T1 to T8) during the induction of general anesthesia. Bland‒Altman analysis was conducted to assess the consistency between the IoC1 and BIS, including the calculation of mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LOAs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the IoC1 for loss of responsiveness.

RESULTS

The mean difference in the BIS and IoC1 values from T1 to T8 between the two measurement methods was - 0.4308 (95% LOA ranging from - 19.47 to 18.61). There was no significant difference between the IoC1 and BIS (P = 0.6664). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for the IoC1 and BIS in predicting loss of responsiveness were 0.9821 (95% CI 0.9741 to 0.9900) and 0.9855 (95% CI 0.9789 to 0.9922), respectively. The optimal threshold values were 91.5 (sensitivity 94.6%, specificity 96.0%) and 82.5 (sensitivity 99.2%, specificity 93.7%).

CONCLUSION

The IoC1 is highly consistent with the BIS in the assessment of the sedative effects of ciprofol during general anesthesia induction. The IoC is effective in monitoring the sedative effects of ciprofol when responsiveness disappears. The IoC is an effective monitoring tool for monitoring the sedative effects of ciprofol-induced general anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2400086320.

摘要

背景

我们研究了意识指数(IoC)和脑电双频指数(BIS)在全身麻醉诱导期间监测环丙泊酚镇静效果的一致性和准确性。有大量文献报道IoC1与BIS在反映丙泊酚和七氟醚诱导的镇静水平方面具有良好的一致性和相关性,但在反映环丙泊酚诱导的镇静水平方面并非如此。

目的

旨在比较IoC和BIS在全身麻醉诱导期间监测环丙泊酚镇静效果的一致性和准确性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。纳入了130例年龄在18至65岁之间、在全身麻醉下接受非心脏或非颅脑择期手术的患者。对所有患者同时进行BIS和IoC的密切监测。在全身麻醉诱导期间的八个特定时间点(T1至T8)记录IoC1和BIS值。采用Bland-Altman分析评估IoC1与BIS之间的一致性,包括计算平均差异和95%一致性界限(LOA)。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估IoC1对反应消失的预测准确性。

结果

两种测量方法在T1至T8期间BIS和IoC1值的平均差异为-0.4308(95% LOA为-19.47至18.61)。IoC1与BIS之间无显著差异(P = 0.6664)。IoC1和BIS预测反应消失的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.9821(95% CI 0.9741至0.9900)和0.9855(95% CI 0.9789至0.9922)。最佳阈值分别为91.5(敏感性94.6%,特异性96.0%)和82.5(敏感性99.2%,特异性93.7%)。

结论

在全身麻醉诱导期间评估环丙泊酚的镇静效果时,IoC1与BIS高度一致。当反应消失时,IoC可有效监测环丙泊酚的镇静效果。IoC是监测环丙泊酚诱导的全身麻醉镇静效果的有效监测工具。

试验注册

ChiCTR2400086320。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb7/11702019/e795433f7cd3/13741_2024_484_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验