Hintermeier Maren, Gottlieb Nora, Rohleder Sven, Oppenberg Jan, Baroudi Mazen, Pernitez-Agan Sweetmavourneen, Lopez Janice, Flores Sergio, Mohsenpour Amir, Wickramage Kolitha, Bozorgmehr Kayvan
Section Health Equity Studies & Migration, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Department of Population Medicine and Health Services Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 10;74:102698. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102698. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Evidence amounted early that migrants, who are often side-lined in pandemic response or preparedness plans, are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences. However, synthesised evidence that quantifies the magnitude of inequalities in infection risk, disease outcomes, consequences of pandemic measures or that explains the underlying mechanisms is lacking.
We conducted a systematic review searching 25 databases and grey literature (12/2019 to 09/2023) and considered empirical articles covering migrants, refugees, asylum-seekers, and internally displaced persons reporting COVID-19 cases, hospitalisation, ICU admission, mortality, COVID-19 vaccination rates or health consequences of pandemic measures. Random-effects meta-analysis of observational studies and qualitative analysis were performed for evidence synthesis. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021296952).
Out of 17,088 records, we included 370 reports in the review. For the quantitative studies (n = 65; mainly from high income countries), meta-analysis with over 53 million participants studied showed that, compared to non-migrants, migrants have an elevated risk of infection (RR = 1.84; 95%-CI: 1.44-2.35) but similar risk for hospitalisation (RR = 1.10; 0.91-1.33), while the probability of ICU admission was higher (RR = 1.23; 0.99-1.52). Among those hospitalised, migrants had a lower risk of mortality (RR = 0.56; 0.42-0.76), while their population-based mortality tended to be higher (RR = 1.46; 0.95-2.26). The qualitative synthesis (n = 75) highlighted the complex interplay of social and COVID-19-related factors at different levels. This involved increased exposure, risk, and impact of pandemic measures that compromised the health of migrants.
Even in the advanced stages of the pandemic, migrants faced higher infection risks and disproportionately suffered from the consequences of COVID-19 disease, including deaths. Population-level interventions in future health emergencies must better consider socio-economic, structural and community-level exposures to mitigate risks among migrants. Enhancing health information systems is crucial, as the lack of migration variables makes it difficult to close coverage gaps, leaving migrants largely 'invisible' in official data.
None.
早期有证据表明,在疫情应对或防范计划中常常被边缘化的移民,受到新冠疫情及其后果的影响尤为严重。然而,目前缺乏综合证据来量化感染风险、疾病结果、疫情措施后果方面的不平等程度,或者解释其潜在机制。
我们进行了一项系统综述,检索了25个数据库和灰色文献(2019年12月至2023年9月),纳入了涉及移民、难民、寻求庇护者和境内流离失所者,报告新冠病例、住院情况、重症监护病房收治情况、死亡率、新冠疫苗接种率或疫情措施对健康影响的实证文章。对观察性研究进行随机效应荟萃分析,并进行定性分析以综合证据。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(CRD42021296952)。
在17,088条记录中,我们纳入了370篇综述报告。对于定量研究(n = 65;主要来自高收入国家),对超过5300万参与者的荟萃分析表明,与非移民相比,移民感染风险更高(风险比RR = 1.84;95%置信区间CI:1.44 - 2.35),但住院风险相似(RR = 1.10;0.91 - 1.33),而进入重症监护病房的概率更高(RR = 1.23;0.99 - 1.52)。在住院患者中,移民的死亡风险较低(RR = 0.56;0.42 - 0.76),而基于人群的死亡率往往较高(RR = 1.46;0.95 - 2.26)。定性综合分析(n = 75)突出了不同层面社会因素与新冠相关因素之间复杂的相互作用。这包括疫情措施导致移民接触风险增加、受到的影响更大,损害了他们的健康。
即使在疫情后期,移民仍面临更高的感染风险,且在新冠疾病后果(包括死亡)方面遭受了不成比例的痛苦。在未来的卫生紧急情况中,针对人群层面的干预措施必须更好地考虑社会经济、结构和社区层面的接触情况,以降低移民中的风险。加强卫生信息系统至关重要,因为缺乏移民变量使得难以填补覆盖缺口,导致移民在官方数据中基本“隐形”。
无。