• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于服务生态系统框架的在线协作创新社区中互动对价值共创影响的元分析

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Interaction on Value Co-Creation in Online Collaborative Innovation Communities Based on the Service Ecosystem Framework.

作者信息

Wang Chunzhen, Zhao Xin, Hong Jianzhong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China.

Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;14(12):1177. doi: 10.3390/bs14121177.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121177
PMID:39767318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673022/
Abstract

Interaction is typically at the core of the value co-creation process through operant resource exchange in online collaborative innovation communities (OCICs). While some studies emphasize the facilitating effect of interaction on value co-creation, others have drawn opposite conclusions, such as more peer interaction leads to less idea generation. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to utilize the service ecosystem framework to clarify the overall relationship between interaction and value co-creation and to explore the moderating factors that may have contributed to the divergence and inconsistency of previous studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of 65 effect sizes obtained from 63 articles with a cumulative sample size of 25,185 between 2004 and 2023, using a random effects model. The results indicate that interaction has a significantly positive impact on user value co-creation within OCICs ( = 0.453, 95%CI [0.405, 0.499]), and the heterogeneity among studies was significant ( = 1409.29, < 0.001). The strength of this correlation was moderated by the types of interaction (human-computer or human-human interactions), the types of OCICs (business-sponsored or socially constructed online communities), and the number of involved OCICs (one or multiple online communities), but not by the cultural background. These findings support the service ecosystem perspective rather than resource scarcity theory by resolving the mixed findings regarding the relationship between interaction and user value co-creation. Furthermore, this study systematically examined the contingent factors separately across three levels, micro (types of actor interactions), meso (types and number of OCICs), and macro (cultural background), combining the whole and the part insights, and empirically integrating service ecosystems as the foundational paradigm and unit of analysis for value co-creation research for the first time. This research contributes to theoretical frameworks in service ecosystems and offers actionable insights for management practices in business and marketing.

摘要

在在线协作创新社区(OCIC)中,互动通常是通过操作性资源交换实现价值共创过程的核心。虽然一些研究强调互动对价值共创的促进作用,但另一些研究却得出了相反的结论,比如更多的同行互动会导致创意产生减少。因此,本文旨在利用服务生态系统框架来阐明互动与价值共创之间的整体关系,并探索可能导致先前研究出现分歧和不一致的调节因素。我们使用随机效应模型,对2004年至2023年间从63篇文章中获得的65个效应量进行了荟萃分析,累积样本量为25185。结果表明,互动对OCIC中的用户价值共创具有显著的正向影响( = 0.453,95%置信区间[0.405,0.499]),且研究之间的异质性显著( = 1409.29, < 0.00)。这种相关性的强度受到互动类型(人机或人际互动)、OCIC类型(商业赞助或社会构建的在线社区)以及所涉及的OCIC数量(一个或多个在线社区)的调节,但不受文化背景的调节。这些发现通过解决关于互动与用户价值共创关系的混合研究结果,支持了服务生态系统视角而非资源稀缺理论。此外,本研究首次系统地从微观(参与者互动类型)、中观(OCIC的类型和数量)和宏观(文化背景)三个层面分别考察了权变因素,将整体与部分的见解相结合,并将服务生态系统作为价值共创研究的基础范式和分析单位进行了实证整合。本研究为服务生态系统的理论框架做出了贡献,并为商业和营销中的管理实践提供了可操作见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/1ad0cd5f804a/behavsci-14-01177-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/8881cf96d39a/behavsci-14-01177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/1357dd19f73a/behavsci-14-01177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/e0fbbec5c08a/behavsci-14-01177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/1ad0cd5f804a/behavsci-14-01177-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/8881cf96d39a/behavsci-14-01177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/1357dd19f73a/behavsci-14-01177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/e0fbbec5c08a/behavsci-14-01177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2a/11673022/1ad0cd5f804a/behavsci-14-01177-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Interaction on Value Co-Creation in Online Collaborative Innovation Communities Based on the Service Ecosystem Framework.基于服务生态系统框架的在线协作创新社区中互动对价值共创影响的元分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;14(12):1177. doi: 10.3390/bs14121177.
2
User involvement and value co-creation in well-being ecosystems.用户参与和价值共创在幸福感生态系统中的作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Sep 26;37(9):34-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339.
3
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
The value co-creation mechanism of Public Cultural Services ecosystem in China based on "public value" theory.基于“公共价值”理论的中国公共文化服务生态系统价值共创机制
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0315192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315192. eCollection 2025.
7
Research on value co-creation mechanism of platform enterprises in digital innovation ecosystem: A case study on Haier HOPE platform in China.数字创新生态系统中平台企业价值共创机制研究:以中国海尔 HOPE 平台为例
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1055932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1055932. eCollection 2022.
8
Navigating Value Co-Destruction in Open Innovation Communities: An Empirical Study of Expectancy Disconfirmation and Psychological Contracts in Business Analytics Communities.应对开放式创新社区中的价值共同破坏:商业分析社区中期望落差与心理契约的实证研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;13(4):334. doi: 10.3390/bs13040334.
9
Mapping Value Co-creation Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis.技术与创新管理领域价值共创文献图谱:文献耦合分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:588648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648. eCollection 2020.
10
Value co-creation and donation in non-profits: a social analysis through the service-dominant logic.非营利组织中的价值共创与捐赠:基于服务主导逻辑的社会分析
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(3):26. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00328-5. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating Value Co-Destruction in Open Innovation Communities: An Empirical Study of Expectancy Disconfirmation and Psychological Contracts in Business Analytics Communities.应对开放式创新社区中的价值共同破坏:商业分析社区中期望落差与心理契约的实证研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;13(4):334. doi: 10.3390/bs13040334.
2
The Mediating Effect of Psychological Ownership on the Relationship between Value Co-Creation and the In-App Purchasing Intention of Mobile Games Players.心理所有权在价值共创与手机游戏玩家内购意愿关系中的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;13(3):205. doi: 10.3390/bs13030205.
3
Evaluating the individual, situational, and technological drivers for creative ideas generation in virtual communities: A systematic literature review.
评估虚拟社区中产生创意想法的个人、情境和技术驱动因素:一项系统的文献综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:978856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978856. eCollection 2022.
4
Global Increases in Individualism.全球个人主义的增长。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1228-1239. doi: 10.1177/0956797617700622. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
Personas in online health communities.在线健康社区中的用户角色。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:212-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Brand communities embedded in social networks.嵌入社交网络中的品牌社群。
J Bus Res. 2013 Feb;66(2-2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.015.
7
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
8
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?评估荟萃分析中的异质性:Q统计量还是I²指数?
Psychol Methods. 2006 Jun;11(2):193-206. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193.
9
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.通过一种简单的图形检验检测荟萃分析中的偏倚。
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.