da Costa Izabela, Junqueira Rafael Binato, Faé Daniele Sorgatto, de Souza Luisa Amorim Pêgas, Lemos Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Avançado Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPgCAS), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;21(12):1563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121563.
The prevalence of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) in patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) remains unclear. Given these discrepancies, an updated review of the evidence on the risk of TDI in patients with ASD is essential. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prevalence of TDI in patients with ASD and compare it to that in neurotypical patients. This study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024580127) and followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of four databases-MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase-was conducted for articles published up to August 2024. Moreover, the gray literature (ProQuest) and reference lists were screened. The inclusion criteria required participants with ASD to assess TDI across deciduous, mixed, and permanent dentition regardless of age. No restrictions were applied on TDI type, language, or publication date. Additionally, case reports, reviews, letters, and studies addressing other oral disorders without specific TDI data were excluded. A single-arm meta-analysis evaluated the cumulative proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI) of TDI in patients with ASD. Moreover, a comparative meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of TDI between ASD and neurotypical patients, calculating the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI, and a < 0.05 was deemed significant, using the R program. Quality assessment was performed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. A total of 22 studies were included to determine the overall prevalence of TDI, of which 16 studies directly compared patients with ASD to neurotypical individuals. In total, 3817 participants were evaluated, including 2162 individuals with ASD and 1655 neurotypical patients. A single-arm meta-analysis estimated a TDI prevalence of 22% (Confidence Interval [CI]: 17-27%) among patients with ASD. A significant difference in the risk was observed between ASD and neurotypical patients ( = 0.003; Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.67; CI: 1.19-2.26). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed in this analysis. Although the majority of studies were rated as high quality, the certainty of the evidence was considered very low. Despite the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that patients with ASD are at a higher risk of developing TDI than the risk observed in neurotypical patients. Therefore, preventive educational initiatives are recommended to reduce the risk of TDI in this population.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者中创伤性牙损伤(TDI)的患病率仍不明确。鉴于这些差异,对ASD患者TDI风险的证据进行更新回顾至关重要。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估ASD患者中TDI的患病率,并将其与神经典型患者进行比较。本研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42024580127)登记,并遵循《Cochrane系统评价干预措施手册》和PRISMA指南。对四个数据库——MEDLINE/PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Embase——进行了全面检索,以查找截至2024年8月发表的文章。此外,还筛选了灰色文献(ProQuest)和参考文献列表。纳入标准要求患有ASD的参与者评估乳牙列、混合牙列和恒牙列中的TDI,年龄不限。对TDI类型、语言或出版日期没有限制。此外,排除了病例报告、综述、信函以及涉及其他口腔疾病但无特定TDI数据的研究。单臂荟萃分析评估了ASD患者中TDI的累积比例和95%置信区间(CI)。此外,进行了比较荟萃分析,以评估ASD患者和神经典型患者之间TDI的风险,计算比值比(OR)及其95%CI,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义,使用R程序进行分析。使用美国国立心肺血液研究所的工具进行质量评估,并使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。共纳入22项研究以确定TDI的总体患病率,其中16项研究直接将ASD患者与神经典型个体进行了比较。总共评估了3817名参与者,包括2162名ASD患者和1655名神经典型患者。单臂荟萃分析估计ASD患者中TDI的患病率为22%(置信区间[CI]:17%-27%)。观察到ASD患者和神经典型患者之间的风险存在显著差异(P=0.003;比值比[OR]:1.67;CI:1.19-2.26)。然而,在该分析中观察到了相当大的异质性。尽管大多数研究被评为高质量,但证据的确定性被认为非常低。尽管本研究存在局限性,但研究结果表明,ASD患者发生TDI的风险高于神经典型患者。因此,建议采取预防性教育措施以降低该人群中TDI的风险。