Cardoso André, Ribeiro Andreia, Carneiro Paula, Colim Ana
DTx Digital Transformation Colab, Campus of Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Algoritmi Research Centre/LASI, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;21(12):1695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121695.
This review provides a comprehensive analysis of studies investigating the impact of occupational exoskeletons on work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) risk factors. The primary objective is to examine the methodologies used to assess the effectiveness of these devices across various occupational tasks. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. A total of 49 studies were included, identified through searches conducted in Scopus and Web of Science databases, with the search string launched in August 2024. The review identifies a growing body of research on passive and active exoskeletons, with a notable focus on laboratory-based evaluations. The results indicate that direct measurement and self-report methods are the preferred approaches in these domains. Ergonomic limitations and user discomfort remain concerns in some cases. The findings of this review may influence stakeholders by providing insights into the potential benefits of adopting exoskeletons and improving workplace ergonomics to reduce WMSD risks. Additionally, the identification of WMSD assessment methods will be valuable for validating the use of these technologies in the workplace. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, emphasizing the need for more real-world assessments and improved exoskeleton designs to enhance user comfort and efficacy.
本综述对研究职业外骨骼对与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD)风险因素影响的各项研究进行了全面分析。主要目的是考察用于评估这些设备在各种职业任务中有效性的方法。按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统综述,涵盖2014年至2024年发表的研究。通过在Scopus和科学网数据库中进行检索,共纳入49项研究,检索词于2024年8月发布。该综述发现,关于被动式和主动式外骨骼的研究越来越多,尤其侧重于基于实验室的评估。结果表明,直接测量和自我报告方法是这些领域的首选方法。在某些情况下,人体工程学限制和用户不适仍然是问题。本综述的结果可能会影响利益相关者,为采用外骨骼的潜在益处以及改善工作场所人体工程学以降低WMSD风险提供见解。此外,确定WMSD评估方法对于验证这些技术在工作场所的使用将具有重要价值。综述最后对未来研究提出了建议,强调需要进行更多的实际评估并改进外骨骼设计,以提高用户舒适度和功效。