Theodorakos Ilias, Andersen Michael Skipper
Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;11(12):1183. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121183.
Optimization procedures provide ligament parameters by minimizing the difference between experimental measurements and computational simulations. Literature values are used as initial guesses of ligament parameters for these optimization procedures. However, it remains unknown how these values affect the estimation of ligament parameters. This study evaluates the effects of the initial guess on estimations of ligament parameters. A synthetic data set was generated using a subject-specific knee computational model, reference ligament parameters and simulated laxity tests. Subsequently, ligament parameters were estimated using an optimization routine and four different initial guesses. The distance of these initial guesses from their true values ranged from 0 to 3.5 kN and from 0 to 3.6% for the stiffness and reference strains, respectively. The optimized ligament parameters had an average absolute mean error ranging from 0.15 (0.09) kN and 0.08 (0.04)% to 3.67 (2.46) kN and 1.25 (0.76)%, while the kinematic error remained below 1 mm and 1.2° for all conditions. Our results showed that the estimations of the ligament parameters worsened as the initial guesses moved farther away from their true values. Moreover, the optimization procedure resulted in suboptimal ligament parameters that provided similar behavior to the true laxity behavior, which is an alarming finding that should be further investigated.
优化程序通过最小化实验测量值与计算模拟值之间的差异来提供韧带参数。文献值被用作这些优化程序中韧带参数的初始猜测值。然而,这些值如何影响韧带参数的估计仍不清楚。本研究评估了初始猜测值对韧带参数估计的影响。使用特定个体的膝关节计算模型、参考韧带参数和模拟松弛试验生成了一个合成数据集。随后,使用优化程序和四种不同的初始猜测值来估计韧带参数。这些初始猜测值与真实值的距离,对于刚度和参考应变分别为0至3.5 kN和0至3.6%。优化后的韧带参数平均绝对平均误差范围从0.15(0.09)kN和0.08(0.04)%到3.67(2.46)kN和1.25(0.76)%,而在所有情况下运动误差均保持在1 mm和1.2°以下。我们的结果表明,随着初始猜测值与真实值的距离增大,韧带参数的估计变差。此外,优化程序得到的韧带参数并非最优,但其提供的行为与真实的松弛行为相似,这是一个值得进一步研究的警示性发现。