Editorial: An Update on How CORR Evaluates Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (Which You Might Also Consider When Reading Them).
作者信息
Leopold Seth S, Gebhardt Mark C, Gioe Terence J, Manner Paul A, Porcher Raphaël, Rimnac Clare M, Wongworawat Montri D
机构信息
Editor-in-Chief, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® , Schaumburg, IL, USA.
Senior Editor, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® , Schaumburg, IL, USA.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):369-371. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003338. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editorial: An Update on How CORR Evaluates Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (Which You Might Also Consider When Reading Them).社论：《CORR 如何评估系统评价和荟萃分析的最新情况（阅读时你也可能会考虑这些）》
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):369-371. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003338. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂（GLP-1 RAs）减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果：一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病：网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗：一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟：综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
7
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
8
Borderline Personality as a Factor in Late, Missed, and Mis-Diagnosis in Autistic Girls and Women: A Conceptual Analysis.边缘型人格障碍作为自闭症女孩和女性晚期诊断延误、漏诊及误诊的一个因素：概念分析
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):401-427. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0034. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme.衡量卫生研究影响的模型与应用：卫生技术评估项目系统评价的更新
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(76):1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta20760.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验：定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
本文引用的文献
1
Editorial: Reality Checking Some Publishing Myths, and Thanking CORR' s Peer Reviewers.社论：审视一些出版神话，并感谢《临床矫形外科学与相关研究》的同行评审员。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2091-2093. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003275. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Editorial: Writing for CORR ® (Revisited).社论：为《CORR®》撰稿（再探讨）。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):629-635. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002607. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Editorial: When to Trust a Meta-analysis or Systematic Review About a Surgical Treatment, and Why.社论：何时该相信关于外科治疗的荟萃分析或系统评价，以及为何要相信。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):437-438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002117.
4
Meta-analysis of time-to-event data: a comparison of two-stage methods.时间事件数据的荟萃分析：两种两阶段方法的比较。
Res Synth Methods. 2011 Sep;2(3):139-49. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.44. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
5
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
6
Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.非随机研究的方法学指标（未成年人）：一种新工具的开发与验证
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.
7
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?评估随机临床试验报告的质量：设盲是否必要？
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
8
Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.将个体随机试验质量的差异纳入荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90085-2.
Zotero 插件