Ray Wayne A, Chung Cecilia P, Murray Katherine T, Malow Beth A, Daugherty James R, Stein C Michael
Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Cecilia P. Chung, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 15;18(7):e1003709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003709. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Benzodiazepine hypnotics and the related nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics (z-drugs) are among the most frequently prescribed medications for older adults. Both can depress respiration, which could have fatal cardiorespiratory effects, particularly among patients with concurrent opioid use. Trazodone, frequently prescribed in low doses for insomnia, has minimal respiratory effects, and, consequently, may be a safer hypnotic for older patients. Thus, for patients beginning treatment with benzodiazepine hypnotics or z-drugs, we compared deaths during periods of current hypnotic use, without or with concurrent opioids, to those for comparable patients receiving trazodone in doses up to 100 mg.
The retrospective cohort study in the United States included 400,924 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years of age or older without severe illness or evidence of substance use disorder initiating study hypnotic therapy from January 2014 through September 2015. Study endpoints were out-of-hospital (primary) and total mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for demographic characteristics, psychiatric and neurologic disorders, cardiovascular and renal conditions, respiratory diseases, pain-related diagnoses and medications, measures of frailty, and medical care utilization in a time-dependent propensity score-stratified analysis. Patients without concurrent opioids had 32,388 person-years of current use, 260 (8.0/1,000 person-years) out-of-hospital and 418 (12.9/1,000) total deaths for benzodiazepines; 26,497 person-years,150 (5.7/1,000) out-of-hospital and 227 (8.6/1,000) total deaths for z-drugs; and 16,177 person-years,156 (9.6/1,000) out-of-hospital and 256 (15.8/1,000) total deaths for trazodone. Out-of-hospital and total mortality for benzodiazepines (respective HRs: 0.99 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.22, p = 0.954] and 0.95 [0.82 to 1.14, p = 0.513] and z-drugs (HRs: 0.96 [0.76 to 1.23], p = 0.767 and 0.87 [0.72 to 1.05], p = 0.153) did not differ significantly from that for trazodone. Patients with concurrent opioids had 4,278 person-years of current use, 90 (21.0/1,000) out-of-hospital and 127 (29.7/1,000) total deaths for benzodiazepines; 3,541 person-years, 40 (11.3/1,000) out-of-hospital and 64 (18.1/1,000) total deaths for z-drugs; and 2,347 person-years, 19 (8.1/1,000) out-of-hospital and 36 (15.3/1,000) total deaths for trazodone. Out-of-hospital and total mortality for benzodiazepines (HRs: 3.02 [1.83 to 4.97], p < 0.001 and 2.21 [1.52 to 3.20], p < 0.001) and z-drugs (HRs: 1.98 [1.14 to 3.44], p = 0.015 and 1.65 [1.09 to 2.49], p = 0.018) were significantly increased relative to trazodone; findings were similar with exclusion of overdose deaths or restriction to those with cardiovascular causes. Limitations included composition of the study cohort and potential confounding by unmeasured variables.
In US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years of age or older without concurrent opioids who initiated treatment with benzodiazepine hypnotics, z-drugs, or low-dose trazodone, study hypnotics were not associated with mortality. With concurrent opioids, benzodiazepines and z-drugs were associated with increased out-of-hospital and total mortality. These findings indicate that the dangers of benzodiazepine-opioid coadministration go beyond the documented association with overdose death and suggest that in combination with opioids, the z-drugs may be more hazardous than previously thought.
苯二氮䓬类催眠药及相关非苯二氮䓬类催眠药(Z类药物)是老年人最常处方的药物之一。两者均可抑制呼吸,这可能产生致命的心肺效应,尤其是在同时使用阿片类药物的患者中。曲唑酮常用于低剂量治疗失眠,对呼吸影响极小,因此可能是老年患者更安全的催眠药。因此,对于开始使用苯二氮䓬类催眠药或Z类药物治疗的患者,我们比较了当前使用催眠药期间(无论是否同时使用阿片类药物)的死亡情况与接受剂量高达100mg曲唑酮的类似患者的死亡情况。
在美国进行的这项回顾性队列研究纳入了400924名65岁及以上、无严重疾病或物质使用障碍证据的医疗保险受益人,他们于2014年1月至2015年9月开始接受研究催眠治疗。研究终点为院外(主要)死亡率和总死亡率。在时间依赖性倾向评分分层分析中,对人口统计学特征、精神和神经疾病、心血管和肾脏疾病、呼吸系统疾病、疼痛相关诊断和药物、虚弱程度指标以及医疗服务利用情况进行了风险比(HRs)调整。未同时使用阿片类药物的患者中,苯二氮䓬类药物当前使用的人年数为32388人年,院外死亡260例(8.0/1000人年),总死亡418例(12.9/1000);Z类药物当前使用的人年数为26497人年,院外死亡150例(5.7/1000),总死亡227例(8.6/1000);曲唑酮当前使用的人年数为16177人年,院外死亡156例(9.6/1000),总死亡256例(15.8/1000)。苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的院外死亡率和总死亡率与曲唑酮相比无显著差异(苯二氮䓬类药物的HRs分别为:0.99[95%置信区间,0.81至1.22,p = 0.954]和0.95[0.82至1.14,p = 0.513];Z类药物的HRs为:0.96[0.76至1.23],p = 0.767和0.87[0.72至1.05],p = 0.153)。同时使用阿片类药物的患者中,苯二氮䓬类药物当前使用的人年数为4278人年,院外死亡90例(21.0/1000),总死亡127例(29.7/1000);Z类药物当前使用的人年数为354人年,院外死亡40例(11.3/1000),总死亡64例(18.1/1000);曲唑酮当前使用的人年数为2347人年,院外死亡19例(8.1/),总死亡36例(15.3/1000)。与曲唑酮相比,苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物的院外死亡率和总死亡率显著增加(苯二氮䓬类药物的HRs为:3.02[1.83至4.97],p < 0.001和2.21[1.52至3.20],p < 0.001;Z类药物的HRs为:1.98[1.14至3.44],p = 0.015和1.65[1.09至2.49],p = 0.018);排除过量死亡或仅限于心血管原因导致的死亡时,结果相似。局限性包括研究队列的构成以及未测量变量可能造成的混杂。
在美国65岁及以上、未同时使用阿片类药物且开始使用苯二氮䓬类催眠药、Z类药物或低剂量曲唑酮治疗的医疗保险受益人中,研究中的催眠药与死亡率无关。同时使用阿片类药物时,苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物与院外死亡率和总死亡率增加相关。这些发现表明,苯二氮䓬类药物与阿片类药物联合使用的危险超出了已记录的与过量死亡的关联,提示与阿片类药物联合使用时,Z类药物可能比之前认为的更具危险性。