• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔内感染的疾病严重程度。两种指标的比较。

Severity of illness in intra-abdominal infection. A comparison of two indexes.

作者信息

Skau T, Nyström P O, Carlsson C

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1985 Feb;120(2):152-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390260022004.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390260022004
PMID:3977587
Abstract

The severity of illness in 58 surgical patients with high-grade intra-abdominal infection was measured with two methods, an acute physiology score and a septic severity score. Both methods are the summed weight of derangements in physiologic factors representing the function of the major organ systems of the body. Sixteen patients died (28%). Score values with both methods were significantly higher for nonsurvivors than for survivors. There was good interrelation between the methods, and the scores correlated better with mortality than did age, chronic disease, anatomy, or cause. Three risk levels were recognized, low, high, and intermediate, with respective mortality rates of less than 10%, greater than 80%, and approximately 45%. Three-fourths of the patients were assigned to the same risk group with both methods. The severity of illness in patients with intra-abdominal infection can suitably be measured with both methods.

摘要

采用两种方法对58例患有严重腹腔内感染的外科患者的疾病严重程度进行了测量,即急性生理学评分和脓毒症严重程度评分。这两种方法都是代表身体主要器官系统功能的生理因素紊乱的加权总和。16例患者死亡(28%)。两种方法的评分值在非幸存者中均显著高于幸存者。两种方法之间存在良好的相关性,且评分与死亡率的相关性优于年龄、慢性病、解剖结构或病因。确定了三个风险水平,低、高和中等,相应的死亡率分别低于10%、高于80%和约45%。四分之三的患者用两种方法被归为同一风险组。腹腔内感染患者的疾病严重程度可以用这两种方法进行适当测量。

相似文献

1
Severity of illness in intra-abdominal infection. A comparison of two indexes.腹腔内感染的疾病严重程度。两种指标的比较。
Arch Surg. 1985 Feb;120(2):152-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390260022004.
2
Prognosis in intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis on 604 patients.腹腔内感染的预后。对604例患者的多因素分析。
Arch Surg. 1996 Jun;131(6):641-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014.
3
Staged abdominal repair in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection: analysis of 102 patients.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(5):646-51. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00051-3.
4
Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis. Do we need new scoring systems?腹膜炎的预后与治疗。我们是否需要新的评分系统?
Arch Surg. 1996 Feb;131(2):180-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140070019.
5
Factors Affecting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients With Cirrhosis Hospitalized for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.影响因自发性细菌性腹膜炎住院的肝硬化患者死亡率和发病率的因素。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Nov;13 Suppl 3:131-6. doi: 10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.P71.
6
Peritonitis into the 1990s: changing pathogens and changing strategies in the critically ill.20世纪90年代的腹膜炎:危重症患者中病原体的变化及应对策略的改变
Am Surg. 1992 Feb;58(2):82-7.
7
Intraabdominal infections: classification, mortality, scoring and pathophysiology.
Infection. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):447-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01726463.
8
Tertiary peritonitis (recurrent diffuse or localized disease) is not an independent predictor of mortality in surgical patients with intraabdominal infection.三发性腹膜炎(复发性弥漫性或局限性疾病)并非腹腔内感染手术患者死亡率的独立预测因素。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2001 Winter;2(4):255-63; discussion 264-5. doi: 10.1089/10962960152813296.
9
Longitudinal outcomes of intra-abdominal infection complicated by critical illness.危重症合并腹腔内感染的纵向结局
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Winter;5(4):365-73. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.365.
10
Mortality for intra-abdominal infection is associated with intrinsic risk factors rather than the source of infection.腹腔内感染的死亡率与内在风险因素相关,而非与感染源相关。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):654-61; discussion 661-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.051.

引用本文的文献

1
High phosphoserine in sepsis: panel of clinical and plasma amino acid correlations.脓毒症中的高磷酸丝氨酸:临床与血浆氨基酸相关性研究小组
Springerplus. 2014 Jun 2;3:279. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-279. eCollection 2014.
2
Staged abdominal repair for treatment of moderate to severe secondary peritonitis.分期腹部修复术治疗中重度继发性腹膜炎。
World J Surg. 2005 Feb;29(2):240-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7502-5.
3
Are there patients with peritonitis who require empiric therapy for enterococcus?是否存在需要对肠球菌进行经验性治疗的腹膜炎患者?
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;23(2):73-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-1078-0. Epub 2004 Jan 21.
4
Severity and predicted outcome of postoperative Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.术后铜绿假单胞菌感染的严重程度及预测结果
Surg Today. 1995;25(8):672-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00311481.
5
[The value of clinical parameters for determining the prognosis of peritonitis--validation of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index].[临床参数对腹膜炎预后判断的价值——曼海姆腹膜炎指数的验证]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(3):152-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00680111.
6
[Bacterial peritonitis].[细菌性腹膜炎]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986;369:693-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01274463.
7
Phospholipase A--a parameter of sepsis? A comparison of PLA and Stevens' Sepsis Severity Score.
Klin Wochenschr. 1989 Feb 1;67(3):207-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01711355.
8
Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. Joint Working Party of SIS North America and Europe.腹腔内感染试验的诊断、严重程度评分、分层及预后的拟议定义。北美和欧洲外科感染学会联合工作组
World J Surg. 1990 Mar-Apr;14(2):148-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01664867.
9
Intraabdominal infections: classification, mortality, scoring and pathophysiology.
Infection. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):447-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01726463.