• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找价值:从患者、临床医生和护理人员的角度识别门诊记录的关键要素。

Finding the Value: Identifying the Key Elements of Recorded Clinic Visits From the Perspective of Patients, Clinicians, and Caregivers.

作者信息

Barr Paul J, Wasp Garrett T, Dannenberg Michelle D, Mistler Lisa A, Verma Kanak, Bonasia Kyra, Haslett William R, Ganoe Craig H, Bratches Reed W, Schifferdecker Karen

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70143. doi: 10.1111/hex.70143.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70143
PMID:39776090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to understand what patients, caregivers and clinicians identified as the most important information from their audio-recorded clinic visits and why.

METHODS

We recruited patients, caregivers and clinicians from primary and speciality care clinics at an academic medical centre in New Hampshire, U.S. Participants reviewed a recording or transcript of their visit, identifying meaningful moments and the reasons why. Two researchers performed a summative content analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients, four with caregivers, from six clinicians participated. Patients, caregivers and clinicians identified a median of 7.5 (3-20), 12.5 (6-50) and 18 (4-31) meaningful visit moments, respectively. Moments identified were similar across stakeholders, including patient education, symptoms, recommendations and medications. Four themes emerged as a rationale for finding visit information meaningful: providing and receiving information, sharing the patient experience, forming a care plan, and providing emotional support. Clinicians rarely identified patient statements as important.

CONCLUSION

There was considerable agreement between patients, clinicians and caregivers regarding visit information that is most valuable. Patient contributions may be undervalued by clinicians.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These findings can be used to improve patient-centred visit communication by focusing visit summaries and decision support on information of the most value to participants.

摘要

目的

我们旨在了解患者、护理人员和临床医生从他们的门诊就诊录音中确定的最重要信息是什么以及原因。

方法

我们从美国新罕布什尔州一家学术医疗中心的初级和专科护理诊所招募患者、护理人员和临床医生。参与者查看他们就诊的录音或文字记录,确定有意义的时刻及其原因。两名研究人员对数据进行了总结性内容分析。

结果

来自六位临床医生的16名患者(其中4名有护理人员陪同)参与了研究。患者、护理人员和临床医生分别确定的有意义就诊时刻的中位数为7.5(3 - 20)、12.5(6 - 50)和18(4 - 31)。各利益相关者确定的时刻相似,包括患者教育、症状、建议和药物。出现了四个主题,作为认为就诊信息有意义的理由:提供和接收信息、分享患者经历、制定护理计划以及提供情感支持。临床医生很少将患者的陈述视为重要信息。

结论

患者、临床医生和护理人员在最有价值的就诊信息方面存在相当大的共识。临床医生可能低估了患者的贡献。

实践意义

这些发现可用于通过将就诊总结和决策支持聚焦于对参与者最有价值的信息来改善以患者为中心的就诊沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ca/11708869/274a2b9c8573/HEX-28-e70143-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ca/11708869/274a2b9c8573/HEX-28-e70143-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ca/11708869/274a2b9c8573/HEX-28-e70143-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Finding the Value: Identifying the Key Elements of Recorded Clinic Visits From the Perspective of Patients, Clinicians, and Caregivers.寻找价值:从患者、临床医生和护理人员的角度识别门诊记录的关键要素。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70143. doi: 10.1111/hex.70143.
2
An Audio Personal Health Library of Clinic Visit Recordings for Patients and Their Caregivers (HealthPAL): User-Centered Design Approach.患者及其照护者的临床就诊记录音频个人健康知识库 (HealthPAL):以用户为中心的设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 22;23(10):e25512. doi: 10.2196/25512.
3
The feasibility of sharing digital audio-recordings of clinic visits online with older adults in primary care settings: A multisite trial.在初级保健机构中与老年人在线共享门诊数字录音的可行性:一项多中心试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Feb;131:108574. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108574. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
"Oh, by the way ...": the closing moments of the medical visit.“哦,顺便说一下……”:就诊的结束时刻。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Jan;9(1):24-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599139.
5
Communication Differences between Oncologists and Palliative Care Clinicians: A Qualitative Analysis of Early, Integrated Palliative Care in Patients with Advanced Cancer.肿瘤学家和姑息治疗临床医生之间的沟通差异:晚期癌症患者早期综合姑息治疗的定性分析。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;22(1):41-49. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0092. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
The Feasibility and Acceptability of Sharing Video Recordings of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical Encounters With Patients and Their Caregivers: Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.与肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者及其护理人员分享临床会诊视频记录的可行性和可接受性:试点随机临床试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 26;8:e57519. doi: 10.2196/57519.
7
Standardized Patient Communication and Low-Value Spinal Imaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial.标准化患者沟通与低价值脊柱影像学检查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2441826. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41826.
8
Communication during pediatric asthma visits and self-reported asthma medication adherence.儿科哮喘就诊期间的沟通和自我报告的哮喘药物依从性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):627-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0913. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
9
Clinician Factors Rather Than Patient Factors Affect Discussion of Treatment Options.临床医生因素而非患者因素影响治疗方案的讨论。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1506-1516. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001664.
10
Analysis of threats to research validity introduced by audio recording clinic visits: Selection bias, Hawthorne effect, both, or neither?分析门诊就诊录音对研究效度造成的威胁:选择偏倚、霍桑效应、两者皆有,还是两者皆无?
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research.临床研究中的患者报告结局指标
JAMA. 2022 Aug 2;328(5):472-473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11238.
2
Perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare communication in a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of family caregivers.一项全国代表性横断面调查家庭护理者对 COVID-19 对医疗保健沟通影响的看法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e051154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051154.
3
Patient-Reported Use of the After Visit Summary in a Primary Care Internal Medicine Practice.
患者报告的在基层医疗内科实践中对就诊后总结的使用情况。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Oct;7(5):703-707. doi: 10.1177/2374373519879286. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
New U.S. Law Mandates Access to Clinical Notes: Implications for Patients and Clinicians.美国新法律规定可获取临床记录:对患者和临床医生的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):101-102. doi: 10.7326/M20-5370. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Patient Portal Barriers and Group Differences: Cross-Sectional National Survey Study.患者门户障碍和群体差异:横断面全国调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18870. doi: 10.2196/18870.
6
Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.评估患者采集音频审核和反馈质量改进计划对退伍军人事务医疗保健系统临床医生关注患者生活背景和医疗保健费用的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644.
7
A rapid review of consumer health information needs and preferences.消费者健康信息需求和偏好的快速综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1634-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Shared Decision Making: The Need For Patient-Clinician Conversation, Not Just Information.共同决策:需要医患对话,而非仅仅提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):627-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354.
9
Health information needs, sources, and barriers of primary care patients to achieve patient-centered care: A literature review.以患者为中心的医疗中基层医疗患者的健康信息需求、来源及障碍:一项文献综述
Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):992-1016. doi: 10.1177/1460458215602939. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Coproduction of healthcare service.医疗服务的共同生产
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. Epub 2015 Sep 16.