Suppr超能文献

患者门户障碍和群体差异:横断面全国调查研究。

Patient Portal Barriers and Group Differences: Cross-Sectional National Survey Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.

Center for Healthcare Transformation, Avalere Health, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18870. doi: 10.2196/18870.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Past studies examining barriers to patient portal adoption have been conducted with a small number of patients and health care settings, limiting generalizability.

OBJECTIVE

This study had the following two objectives: (1) to assess the prevalence of barriers to patient portal adoption among nonadopters and (2) to examine the association between nonadopter characteristics and reported barriers in a nationally representative sample.

METHODS

Data from this study were obtained from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey. We calculated descriptive statistics to determine the most prevalent barriers and conducted multiple variable logistic regression analysis to examine which characteristics were associated with the reported barriers.

RESULTS

The sample included 4815 individuals. Among these, 2828 individuals (58.73%) had not adopted a patient portal. Among the nonadopters (n=2828), the most prevalent barriers were patient preference for in-person communication (1810/2828, 64.00%), no perceived need for the patient portal (1385/2828, 48.97%), and lack of comfort and experience with computers (735/2828, 25.99%). Less commonly, individuals reported having no patient portal (650/2828, 22.98%), no internet access (650/2828, 22.98%), privacy concerns (594/2828, 21.00%), difficulty logging on (537/2828, 18.99%), and multiple patient portals (255/2828, 9.02%) as barriers. Men had significantly lower odds of indicating a preference for speaking directly to a provider compared with women (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; P=.01). Older age (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; P<.001), having a chronic condition (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.44-2.33; P<.001), and having an income lower than US $20,000 (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11-2.34; P=.01) were positively associated with indicating a preference for speaking directly to a provider. Hispanic individuals had significantly higher odds of indicating that they had no need for a patient portal (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.05; P<.001) compared with non-Hispanic individuals. Older individuals (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06; P<.001), individuals with less than a high school diploma (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.79-5.53; P<.001), and individuals with a household income of less than US $20,000 (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.88-4.11; P<.001) had significantly higher odds of indicating that they were uncomfortable with a computer.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common barriers to patient portal adoption are preference for in-person communication, not having a need for the patient portal, and feeling uncomfortable with computers, which are barriers that are modifiable and can be intervened upon. Patient characteristics can help predict which patients are most likely to experience certain barriers to patient portal adoption. Further research is needed to tailor implementation approaches based on patients' needs and preferences.

摘要

背景

过去研究患者门户采用障碍的研究都是在少数患者和医疗环境中进行的,这限制了研究结果的普遍性。

目的

本研究有以下两个目标:(1)评估非采用者采用患者门户的障碍的流行程度;(2)在全国代表性样本中检查非采用者特征与报告障碍之间的关联。

方法

本研究的数据来自 2019 年健康信息国家趋势调查。我们计算了描述性统计数据,以确定最常见的障碍,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以检查哪些特征与报告的障碍相关。

结果

样本包括 4815 人。其中,2828 人(58.73%)没有采用患者门户。在非采用者中(n=2828),最常见的障碍是患者更喜欢面对面沟通(1810/2828,64.00%)、没有感知到对患者门户的需求(1385/2828,48.97%)和缺乏对计算机的舒适和经验(735/2828,25.99%)。较少情况下,个体报告没有患者门户(650/2828,22.98%)、没有互联网接入(650/2828,22.98%)、隐私问题(594/2828,21.00%)、登录困难(537/2828,18.99%)和多个患者门户(255/2828,9.02%)作为障碍。与女性相比,男性表示更喜欢直接与提供者交谈的可能性显著降低(比值比 [OR] 0.75,95%CI 0.60-0.94;P=.01)。年龄较大(OR 1.01,95%CI 1.00-1.02;P<.001)、患有慢性病(OR 1.83,95%CI 1.44-2.33;P<.001)和收入低于 20,000 美元(OR 1.61,95%CI 1.11-2.34;P=.01)与表示更喜欢直接与提供者交谈的可能性呈正相关。与非西班牙裔个体相比,西班牙裔个体表示他们没有需要患者门户的可能性显著更高(OR 1.59,95%CI 1.24-2.05;P<.001)。年龄较大的个体(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.04-1.06;P<.001)、没有高中文凭的个体(OR 3.15,95%CI 1.79-5.53;P<.001)和收入低于 20,000 美元的个体(OR 2.78,95%CI 1.88-4.11;P<.001)表示对计算机感到不适的可能性显著更高。

结论

采用患者门户的最常见障碍是更喜欢面对面沟通、没有对患者门户的需求以及对计算机感到不适,这些障碍是可改变的,可以进行干预。患者特征可以帮助预测哪些患者最有可能遇到采用患者门户的某些障碍。需要进一步研究,根据患者的需求和偏好来定制实施方法。

相似文献

1
Patient Portal Barriers and Group Differences: Cross-Sectional National Survey Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18870. doi: 10.2196/18870.
8
Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.
10
Disparities in Electronic Patient Portal Use in Prenatal Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 23;21(9):e14445. doi: 10.2196/14445.

引用本文的文献

2
Assessing the acceptability of using patient portals to recruit pregnant women and new mothers for maternal-child health research.
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf027. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf027. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Patient Portal Use Among Patients With Vascular Anomalies and Their Caregivers.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Jun;72(6):e31706. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31706. Epub 2025 Apr 6.
8
Preferences and expectations of end-users from a mental health educational portal: A qualitative study.
Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Oct 31;14(3):297-303. doi: 10.34172/hpp.43077. eCollection 2024.
10
Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Usage at a Large Pediatric Academic Institution.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun;12(3):1797-1803. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02009-w. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

6
If you build it, they may not come: modifiable barriers to patient portal use among pre- and post-kidney transplant patients.
JAMIA Open. 2018 Jul 10;1(2):255-264. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy024. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Assessment of Patient Use of a New Approach to Access Health Record Data Among 12 US Health Systems.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9544.
10
Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):960-967. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz030.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验