Davis Kenneth L, Montag Christian
Pegasus International, Greensboro, NC, 27408, USA.
Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, BW, 89081, Germany.
Personal Neurosci. 2024 Nov 4;7:e11. doi: 10.1017/pen.2024.4. eCollection 2024.
We compared Ed Diener's (SWLS), which was designed as a purely cognitive measure of global life satisfaction, with the , which provides self-report measures of Panksepp's six primary emotions (excluding LUST), in two English-speaking samples: a main sample and a hold-out validation sample. Our data showed robust negative correlations between higher satisfaction with life and lower FEAR, lower SADNESS/Separation Distress, and positive associations (albeit less strong) between higher satisfaction with life and higher PLAY and SEEKING in both samples. The relationships between the SWLS and at least four of Panksepp's primary emotions suggest Diener's SWLS is not purely cognitive and includes a strong affective component. In addition, detailed analysis of the negative correlation between the SWLS and the ANPS 3.1 SADNESS scale provides insight into the importance of the low arousal end of the SADNESS/Separation Distress brain system and supports the idea of a continuum of psychological states from high SADNESS including loneliness and depression to low SADNESS psychological states characterized by social comfort, self-confidence, and social strength.
我们在两个英语样本(一个主要样本和一个留存验证样本)中,将旨在作为全球生活满意度纯粹认知测量的埃德·迪纳的《生活满意度量表》(SWLS)与提供潘克塞普六种主要情绪(不包括欲望)自我报告测量的量表进行了比较。我们的数据显示,在两个样本中,生活满意度较高与恐惧较低、悲伤/分离痛苦较低之间存在强烈的负相关,而生活满意度较高与游戏和探索较高之间存在正相关(尽管不太强烈)。《生活满意度量表》与潘克塞普至少四种主要情绪之间的关系表明,迪纳的《生活满意度量表》并非纯粹认知性的,而是包含一个强烈的情感成分。此外,对《生活满意度量表》与《情感神经科学痛苦量表》3.1悲伤量表之间负相关的详细分析,深入了解了悲伤/分离痛苦脑系统低唤醒端的重要性,并支持了从包括孤独和抑郁在内的高悲伤到以社交舒适、自信和社交力量为特征的低悲伤心理状态的心理状态连续体的观点。