• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) emergence in 5 years using mammography images: a comparison study between radiomics and deep learning algorithm.使用乳腺钼靶图像预测5年内2型糖尿病(T2DM)发生风险:影像组学与深度学习算法的比较研究
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(1):014501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.014501. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
A deep learning approach to direct immunofluorescence pattern recognition in autoimmune bullous diseases.深度学习方法在自身免疫性大疱性疾病中的直接免疫荧光模式识别。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):261-266. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae142.
5
Artificial intelligence for diagnosing exudative age-related macular degeneration.人工智能在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 17;10(10):CD015522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015522.pub2.
6
Automated assessment of task-based performance of digital mammography and tomosynthesis systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom and deep learning-based scoring.使用拟人化乳房模型和基于深度学习的评分对数字乳腺摄影和断层合成系统的基于任务的性能进行自动评估。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13005. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Ultrasound-based machine learning model to predict the risk of endometrial cancer among postmenopausal women.基于超声的机器学习模型预测绝经后女性子宫内膜癌风险
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01705-1.
8
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
9
Multilayer perceptron deep learning radiomics model based on Gd-BOPTA MRI to identify vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study.基于钆贝葡胺增强磁共振成像的多层感知器深度学习放射组学模型用于识别肝细胞癌中包裹肿瘤结节的血管:一项多中心研究
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00895-9.
10
The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的主要心血管不良事件预测中的机器学习模型:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 13;27:e68872. doi: 10.2196/68872.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing deep learning and handcrafted radiomics to predict chemoradiotherapy response for locally advanced cervical cancer using pretreatment MRI.比较深度学习和手工制作的放射组学,以使用预处理 MRI 预测局部晚期宫颈癌的放化疗反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51742-z.
2
Comparative analysis of radiomics and deep-learning algorithms for survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma.基于放射组学和深度学习算法的肝细胞癌生存预测的对比分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50451-3.
3
Data sharing in the age of deep learning.深度学习时代的数据共享。
Nat Biotechnol. 2023 Apr;41(4):433. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01770-3.
4
A cardiologist's guide to machine learning in cardiovascular disease prognosis prediction.心脏病学家在心血管疾病预后预测中的机器学习指南。
Basic Res Cardiol. 2023 Mar 20;118(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00395-023-00982-7.
5
A comparative study between deep learning and radiomics models in grading liver tumors using hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced MR images.深度学习与影像组学模型在肝胆期对比增强磁共振成像诊断肝脏肿瘤分级中的对比研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00946-8.
6
A multidomain fusion model of radiomics and deep learning to discriminate between PDAC and AIP based on F-FDG PET/CT images.基于 F-FDG PET/CT 图像的放射组学和深度学习的多域融合模型用于鉴别 PDAC 和 AIP。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Apr;41(4):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01363-1. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
7
Type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病
Lancet. 2022 Nov 19;400(10365):1803-1820. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01655-5. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Radiomics and deep learning methods for the prediction of 2-year overall survival in LUNG1 dataset.基于 LUNG1 数据集的放射组学和深度学习方法预测 2 年总生存率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18085-z.
9
A Comparative Study of Radiomics and Deep-Learning Based Methods for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Prediction in Low Dose CT Images.基于低剂量CT图像的肺结节恶性预测的放射组学与深度学习方法的比较研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 17;11:737368. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.737368. eCollection 2021.
10
Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection.深度学习在癌症诊断、预后和治疗选择中的应用。
Genome Med. 2021 Sep 27;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00968-x.

使用乳腺钼靶图像预测5年内2型糖尿病(T2DM)发生风险:影像组学与深度学习算法的比较研究

Predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) emergence in 5 years using mammography images: a comparison study between radiomics and deep learning algorithm.

作者信息

Letchumanan Nishta, Hanaoka Shouhei, Takenaga Tomomi, Suzuki Yusuke, Nakao Takahiro, Nomura Yukihiro, Yoshikawa Takeharu, Abe Osamu

机构信息

The University of Tokyo, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

The University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(1):014501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.014501. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.014501
PMID:39776665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702674/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been steadily increasing over the years. We aim to predict the occurrence of T2DM using mammography images within 5 years using two different methods and compare their performance.

APPROACH

We examined 312 samples, including 110 positive cases (developed T2DM after 5 years) and 202 negative cases (did not develop T2DM) using two different methods. In the first method, a radiomics-based approach, we utilized radiomics features and machine learning (ML) algorithms. The entire breast region was chosen as the region of interest for extracting radiomics features. Then, a binary breast image was created from which we extracted 668 features and analyzed them using various ML algorithms. In the second method, a complex convolutional neural network (CNN) with a modified ResNet architecture and various kernel sizes was applied to raw mammography images for the prediction task. A nested, stratified five-fold cross-validation was done for both parts A and B to compute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Hyperparameter tuning was also done to enhance the model's performance and reliability.

RESULTS

The radiomics approach's light gradient boosting model gave 68.9% accuracy, 30.7% sensitivity, 89.5% specificity, and 0.63 AUROC. The CNN method achieved an AUROC of 0.58 over 20 epochs.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics outperformed CNN by 0.05 in terms of AUROC. This may be due to the more straightforward interpretability and clinical relevance of predefined radiomics features compared with the complex, abstract features learned by CNNs.

摘要

目的

多年来,2型糖尿病(T2DM)的患病率一直在稳步上升。我们旨在使用两种不同方法,通过乳房X光图像预测5年内T2DM的发生情况,并比较它们的性能。

方法

我们使用两种不同方法检查了312个样本,包括110个阳性病例(5年后发展为T2DM)和202个阴性病例(未发展为T2DM)。在第一种基于放射组学的方法中,我们利用了放射组学特征和机器学习(ML)算法。选择整个乳房区域作为提取放射组学特征的感兴趣区域。然后,创建一个二元乳房图像,从中提取668个特征,并使用各种ML算法进行分析。在第二种方法中,将具有修改后的ResNet架构和各种内核大小的复杂卷积神经网络(CNN)应用于原始乳房X光图像以进行预测任务。对A部分和B部分都进行了嵌套分层五折交叉验证,以计算准确率、灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。还进行了超参数调整,以提高模型的性能和可靠性。

结果

放射组学方法的轻梯度提升模型的准确率为68.9%,灵敏度为30.7%,特异性为89.5%,AUROC为0.63。CNN方法在20个轮次中的AUROC为0.58。

结论

在AUROC方面,放射组学比CNN高出0.05。这可能是因为与CNN学习的复杂抽象特征相比,预定义放射组学特征的解释性更直接且与临床相关性更强。