Juokslahti T
Acta Vet Scand. 1979;20(4):562-71. doi: 10.1186/BF03546584.
Mink feed raw materials were analyzed for total bacterial count, the number of faecal streptococci, the coliform count, the number of haemolytic bacteria and the number of sulphite reducing bacteria. The investigation comprised samples from the following raw materials: four slaughter-house offal products, preserved and unpreserved slaughter blood, Baltic herring, cod filletting offal, fish silage, blood meal, fish meal, meat-bone meal, protein concentrate, brewer’s yeast and cereal feed. The slaughter-house offals and unpreserved slaughter blood had the poorest quality, in terms of all the bacterial types for which the samples were analyzed. There were statistically significant differences in bacterial contents between slaughter-house offals from different sources. The preserved slaughter blood had significantly lower bacterial contents as compared to the unpreserved slaughter blood. Single samples of the cod filletting offal, Baltic herring and the blood meal had relatively high total bacterial counts, but the specified mean bacterial counts were relatively low. The bacterial counts for the rest of the investigated raw materials were relatively low.
对水貂饲料原料进行了总细菌数、粪链球菌数、大肠菌群数、溶血性细菌数和亚硫酸盐还原菌数的分析。调查涵盖了以下原料的样本：四种屠宰场下脚料产品、保存和未保存的屠宰血液、波罗的海鲱鱼、鳕鱼去骨下脚料、鱼青贮饲料、血粉、鱼粉、肉骨粉、蛋白质浓缩物、啤酒酵母和谷物饲料。就所分析样本的所有细菌类型而言，屠宰场下脚料和未保存的屠宰血液质量最差。不同来源的屠宰场下脚料的细菌含量存在统计学上的显著差异。与未保存的屠宰血液相比，保存的屠宰血液细菌含量显著更低。鳕鱼去骨下脚料、波罗的海鲱鱼和血粉的单个样本总细菌数相对较高，但指定的平均细菌数相对较低。其余被调查原料的细菌数相对较低。
