• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针孔视力筛查方法的有效性

Effectiveness of a pinhole method for visual acuity screening.

作者信息

Loewenstein J I, Palmberg P F, Connett J E, Wentworth D N

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Feb;103(2):222-3. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050020074024.

DOI:10.1001/archopht.1985.01050020074024
PMID:3977693
Abstract

Visual acuity screening was performed in the home in an adult population, using a standardized, retroilluminated chart. A pinhole disk was utilized to retest those subjects who initially failed the screening. All subjects failing the screening with the pinholes, and an equal number of age-matched subjects passing the screening (controls), were asked to have a complete ophthalmologic examination, including a protocol refraction in an eye clinic (clinic examination). Without use of the pinhole disk, 14.4% of subjects failed to read a 20/40 line. Use of the pinholes reduced the failure rate to 6.9%. Fifty-seven percent of those failing and 55% of controls had the clinic examination. Determination of best-corrected visual acuity after protocol refraction in the clinic indicated that the false-positive rate (the percentage of subjects who failed the screening but had visual acuity of 20/40 or better on the clinic examination) for the screening was 26%, and the false-negative rate (the percentage of subjects who passed the screening but had visual acuity of worse than 20/40 on the clinic examination) was 1.5%. Use of a pinhole disk is highly effective for visual acuity screening, reducing the false-positive rate by more than half.

摘要

在成年人群体的家中使用标准化的后照式视力表进行视力筛查。对最初筛查未通过的受试者使用针孔镜进行重新测试。所有使用针孔镜筛查仍未通过的受试者,以及数量相等的年龄匹配的筛查通过的受试者(对照组),均被要求进行全面的眼科检查,包括在眼科诊所进行验光检查(诊所检查)。在不使用针孔镜的情况下,14.4%的受试者无法读出20/40行的视标。使用针孔镜后,未通过率降至6.9%。未通过筛查的受试者中有57%以及对照组中有55%进行了诊所检查。在诊所进行验光检查后确定最佳矫正视力,结果表明该筛查的假阳性率(筛查未通过但在诊所检查中视力达到或优于20/40的受试者百分比)为26%,假阴性率(筛查通过但在诊所检查中视力低于20/40的受试者百分比)为1.5%。使用针孔镜对视力筛查非常有效,可将假阳性率降低一半以上。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a pinhole method for visual acuity screening.针孔视力筛查方法的有效性
Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Feb;103(2):222-3. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050020074024.
2
Study of luminance effects on pinhole test results for visually impaired patients.视力受损患者针孔测试结果的亮度影响研究。
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;76(1):50-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199901000-00028.
3
Comparison of visual acuity charts identifying visual impairment among older people outside the eye clinic.比较视力表在眼科诊所外识别老年人视力障碍的效果。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Aug;35(16):1394-400. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.737085. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
Statistical and methodological considerations for vision screening.
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976 Oct;53(10):677-84. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197610000-00007.
5
Outcomes of a vision screening program for underserved populations in the United States.美国针对服务不足人群的视力筛查项目成果。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):201-11. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2013.789533.
6
Vision screening of older people.老年人视力筛查
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Nov;27(6):527-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00525.x.
7
[Measurement of visual acuity in the adult. Precautions to be taken].[成人视力的测量。需采取的预防措施]
Soins. 1980 Nov 20;25(22):13-6.
8
Use of the Arden grating test for screening.使用 Arden 光栅试验进行筛查。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Aug;64(8):591-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.8.591.
9
Improvement of visual acuity by refraction in a low-vision population.低视力人群通过矫正屈光不正提高视力。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
10
Impaired vision in the elderly: a preventable condition.
Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):289-92. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.289.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness survey: Review of the methodology and protocol for the seventh version (RAAB7).可避免失明快速评估调查:第七版(RAAB7)方法与方案综述
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Mar 8;9:133. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20907.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Validity and Reliability of Vis-Screen Application: A Smartphone-Based Distance Vision Testing for Visual Impairment and Blindness Vision Screening.视筛应用的有效性和可靠性:一种基于智能手机的远距离视力测试,用于视力障碍和失明的视力筛查。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 10;59(5):912. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050912.
3
Results of the Pinhole Test Correlate with Hybrid Contact Lens Visual Acuity in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Corneal Diseases.
针孔试验结果与角膜疾病导致视力受损患者的混合角膜接触镜视力相关。
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 24;2022:4932856. doi: 10.1155/2022/4932856. eCollection 2022.
4
Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.在成年印度人群中自动折射的准确性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251583. eCollection 2021.
5
Effective refractive error coverage: an eye health indicator to measure progress towards universal health coverage.有效屈光不正覆盖:一项衡量全民健康覆盖进展的眼健康指标。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Jan;40(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/opo.12662.
6
Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review.印度成年人屈光不正、未矫正屈光不正和老视的患病率:系统评价。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 May;67(5):583-592. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1235_18.
7
Validation of Simplified Visual Acuity Testing Protocols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.肌萎缩侧索硬化症简化视力测试方案的验证
Neuroophthalmology. 2017 Apr 27;41(5):247-252. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1305422. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Vision and Visual History in Elite/Near-Elite-Level Cricketers and Rugby-League Players.精英/准精英水平板球运动员和橄榄球联盟球员的视力与视觉史
Sports Med Open. 2017 Nov 10;3(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40798-017-0106-z.
9
Visual acuity testing using autorefraction or pinhole occluder compared with a manual protocol refraction in individuals with diabetes.糖尿病患者使用自动折射仪或针孔遮罩进行视力测试与手动协议折射测试的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
10
Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.针对移民和难民的循证临床指南。
CMAJ. 2011 Sep 6;183(12):E824-925. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090313. Epub 2010 Jun 7.