Greene M Claire, Andersen Lena S, Leku Marx R, Au Teresa, Akellot Josephine, Upadhaya Nawaraj, Odokonyero Raymond, White Ross, Ventevogel Peter, Garcia-Moreno Claudia, Tol Wietse A
Program on Forced Migration and Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Nov 8;11:e106. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.103. eCollection 2024.
Evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions for men in humanitarian settings is limited. Moreover, engagement and retention of men in such interventions has been challenging. Adaptations may therefore be required to improve the appropriateness and acceptability of these interventions for men. This study conducted formative research and examined the feasibility of combining an MHPSS intervention, Self-Help Plus, with a brief intervention to reduce harmful alcohol use among refugee men in Uganda. We conducted a cluster randomized feasibility trial comparing the combined alcohol intervention and Self-Help Plus, Self-Help Plus alone and enhanced usual care. Participants were 168 South Sudanese refugee men in Rhino Settlement who reported moderate or high levels of psychological distress. Session attendance was adequate: all sessions had at least 69% of participants present. Participant outcome measures, including symptoms of psychological distress, functional impairment, self-defined problems, depressive symptoms, post-traumatic stress symptoms, overall substance use risk, substance specific risk (alcohol, cannabis, stimulants and sedatives) and well-being, were sensitive to change. A combined approach to addressing mental health and alcohol use appears feasible among men in refugee settings, but further research is needed to examine the effectiveness of combined interventions among men.
关于人道主义环境中针对男性的心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)干预措施的有效性及实施情况的证据有限。此外,让男性参与并持续接受此类干预措施颇具挑战性。因此,可能需要进行调整,以提高这些干预措施对男性的适用性和可接受性。本研究开展了形成性研究,并探讨了将MHPSS干预措施“自助增强版”与一项简短干预措施相结合,以减少乌干达难民男性有害饮酒行为的可行性。我们进行了一项整群随机可行性试验,比较了联合酒精干预与“自助增强版”、单独的“自助增强版”以及强化常规护理。参与者为犀牛定居点的168名南苏丹难民男性,他们报告有中度或高度心理困扰。课程出席率良好:所有课程的参与者出席率至少为69%。参与者的结果指标,包括心理困扰症状、功能损害、自我界定的问题、抑郁症状、创伤后应激症状、总体物质使用风险、特定物质风险(酒精、大麻、兴奋剂和镇静剂)以及幸福感,对变化较为敏感。在难民环境中的男性中,采用综合方法解决心理健康和酒精使用问题似乎是可行的,但需要进一步研究来检验综合干预措施对男性的有效性。