Wang Xiaoyi, Zhao Yanfang, Fan Yangyang, Liu Yun
Obstetrics Department, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Obstetrics Department, Weinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Weinan, Shaanxi, China.
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025 Jan;13(1):e70119. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70119.
Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy, and its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remains unclear. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a prothrombotic and inflammatory marker, has been controversially discussed as a potential predictor of miscarriage. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the predictive significance of the PLR in women with miscarriage compared to healthy pregnancies.
Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciencey, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Articles were identified, screened, and evaluated for quality to determine the predictive value of PLR for miscarriage.
Fourteen eligible articles, comprising a total of 3745 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis found comparable PLR levels between miscarriage and non-miscarriage groups (SMD = 0.25; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.05 to 0.54). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in PLR levels in the missed miscarriage group (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.01-0.56). and in studies with sample sizes smaller than 200 (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.05-0.56). Other subgroups did not exhibit significant differences. Subgroup analysis of PLR levels and miscarriage risk demonstrated no significant differences across all subgroups.
PLR is not a reliable predictor of miscarriage in general. However, for missed miscarriage cases, elevated PLR levels may serve as a practical and cost-effective marker for prediction.
流产是妊娠常见的并发症,其潜在的病理生理机制尚不清楚。血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为一种促血栓形成和炎症标志物,作为流产的潜在预测指标一直存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估与正常妊娠相比,PLR在流产女性中的预测意义。
截至2023年12月31日,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆中系统检索相关研究。按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。对文章进行识别、筛选和质量评估,以确定PLR对流产的预测价值。
荟萃分析纳入了14篇符合条件的文章,共3745例患者。汇总分析发现流产组和非流产组的PLR水平相当(标准化均数差[SMD]=0.25;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.05至0.54)。亚组分析显示稽留流产组的PLR水平存在显著差异(SMD=0.29;95%CI:0.01-0.56),以及样本量小于200的研究中(SMD=0.31;95%CI:0.05-0.56)。其他亚组未显示出显著差异。PLR水平与流产风险的亚组分析在所有亚组中均未显示出显著差异。
一般而言,PLR不是流产的可靠预测指标。然而,对于稽留流产病例,升高的PLR水平可能是一种实用且具有成本效益的预测标志物。