Gao Yuan, Bi Yingjie, Yu Lu
Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, 000000, HKSAR, China.
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Feb;374:123921. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123921. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Balancing the forest protection with local economic development is a pressing challenge and a key focus of current environmental policies. Ecological compensation programs (ECPs) are often employed in natural-resource dependent communities to address this dilemma. However, the impacts of ECP on local livelihoods remain controversial, and the mechanisms driving these outcomes are not fully understood. We investigate the impacts of an ECP on the livelihoods of rural residents, drawing on survey data collected from forest communities in Zhejiang, China. Using the propensity score matching (PSM) method to address potential self-selection bias, our findings reveal that ECP has significant and positive impacts on local livelihoods. This improvement is primarily attributed to increased income from forestry and gardening, alongside greater livelihood diversification. While non-agricultural livelihoods are increasingly important, agriculture remains a vital source of household's income. Additionally, the benefits of ECP are disproportionately enjoyed by wealthier and younger residents as well as those who are not left behind, suggesting a potential exacerbation of inequality among household groups. In light of these findings, we recommend implementing tailored financial assistance, enhancing training opportunities, and creating specialized employment roles for vulnerable groups, thereby supporting their livelihood transitions, advancing social equality and fostering the sustainable conservation of forest ecosystems.
平衡森林保护与地方经济发展是一项紧迫的挑战,也是当前环境政策的关键重点。生态补偿项目(ECPs)经常被应用于依赖自然资源的社区,以解决这一困境。然而,生态补偿项目对当地生计的影响仍存在争议,且导致这些结果的机制尚未得到充分理解。我们利用从中国浙江森林社区收集的调查数据,研究了一个生态补偿项目对农村居民生计的影响。通过使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法来解决潜在的自我选择偏差,我们的研究结果表明,生态补偿项目对当地生计有显著的积极影响。这种改善主要归因于林业和园艺收入的增加,以及生计多样化程度的提高。虽然非农业生计越来越重要,但农业仍然是家庭收入的重要来源。此外,较富裕和较年轻的居民以及那些没有被落下的居民不成比例地享受到了生态补偿项目的好处,这表明家庭群体之间的不平等可能会加剧。鉴于这些发现,我们建议为弱势群体实施量身定制的财政援助,增加培训机会,并创造专门的就业岗位,从而支持他们的生计转型,促进社会平等,并推动森林生态系统的可持续保护。