• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估天然林保护工程对农户生计的影响。

Evaluation of the impact of the natural forest protection program on rural household livelihoods.

机构信息

Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, CB3 9EP Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):513-25. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9288-6. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-009-9288-6
PMID:19387724
Abstract

In this study, we estimated the impact on local household livelihoods of the Natural Forest Protection Program (NFPP), which is the largest logging-ban program in the world, which aims to protect watersheds and conserve natural forests. In doing so, we used a series of microeconometric policy-evaluation techniques to assess the impacts of the NFPP on two interrelated facets of household livelihoods: income and off-farm labor supply. We found that the NFPP has had a negative impact on incomes from timber harvesting but has actually had a positive impact on total household incomes from all sources. Furthermore, we found that off-farm labor supply outside the village has increased more rapidly in NFPP than in non-NFPP areas. Based on these results, policy implications for household livelihoods were drawn and are presented herein.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了世界上最大的限伐令项目——天然林保护工程(NFPP)对当地家庭生计的影响。该项目旨在保护流域和天然林。为此,我们使用了一系列微观计量政策评估技术来评估 NFPP 对家庭生计的两个相互关联的方面的影响:收入和非农劳动力供应。我们发现,NFPP 对木材采伐收入产生了负面影响,但实际上却增加了家庭所有来源的总收入。此外,我们发现,村外非农劳动力供应在 NFPP 地区的增长速度快于非 NFPP 地区。基于这些结果,我们提出了对家庭生计的政策启示,并在本文中进行了介绍。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of the natural forest protection program on rural household livelihoods.评估天然林保护工程对农户生计的影响。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):513-25. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9288-6. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
2
An estimation of the effects of China's Priority Forestry Programs on farmers' income.中国重点林业工程对林农收入影响的评估。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):526-40. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9433-2. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
3
An empirical analysis of the effects of China's Land Conversion Program on farmers' income growth and labor transfer.中国土地转换计划对农民收入增长和劳动力转移影响的实证分析。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):502-12. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9376-7. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
4
[Ecological benefits of transfer payment of natural forest protection projects and their impact mechanisms].天然林保护工程转移支付的生态效益及其影响机制
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Aug;31(8):2663-2670. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.009.
5
The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: A case in Shaanxi, China.重大移民搬迁安置工程对农村生计和生态系统服务的影响:以中国陕西为例。
Ambio. 2018 Mar;47(2):245-259. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0941-7. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
China's primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges.中国主要的陆地生态系统恢复计划:启动、实施与挑战。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):429-41. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9373-x. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
7
Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China.农村家庭积极参与“生态系统服务付费”项目的偏好:以中国密云水库集水区为例
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169483. eCollection 2017.
8
Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam's PES program.森林生态系统服务付费能否产生双重红利?对越南 PES 计划的综合影响评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200881. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessing China's ecological restoration programs: what's been done and what remains to be done?评估中国的生态修复计划:已完成的和待完成的?
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):442-53. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9387-4. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
10
Public timber supply, market adjustments, and local economies: economic assumptions of the Northwest Forest Plan.公共木材供应、市场调整与地方经济:《西北森林计划》的经济假设
Conserv Biol. 2006 Apr;20(2):341-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00383.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative analysis of vegetation restoration and potential driving factors in a typical subalpine region of the Eastern Tibet Plateau.定量分析青藏高原东部典型亚高山地区植被恢复及其潜在驱动因素。
PeerJ. 2022 Apr 28;10:e13358. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13358. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing China's ecological restoration programs.评估中国的生态修复项目。
Environ Manage. 2010 Mar;45(3):425-8. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9466-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty.生物多样性保护与消除贫困。
Science. 2004 Nov 12;306(5699):1146-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1097920.
2
China's forest policy for the 21st century.中国21世纪的森林政策。
Science. 2000 Jun 23;288(5474):2135-6. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135.