Mohamedali Zahra, Amarasinghe Gehanjali, Hopkins Christopher W P, Moulton Calum D
Department of Gastroenterology, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jan 31;31(1):18-27. doi: 10.5056/jnm24115.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed.
We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale.
Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; = 0.39; = 0%; N = 3). Of individual symptoms, buspirone improved bloating severity more than placebo (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; = 0.03; N = 2) but did not improve post-prandial fullness ( = 0.24, N = 2) or nausea ( = 0.75, N = 2). All RCTs included in the meta-analysis were good quality but most treated for only 4 weeks.
We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.
背景/目的:丁螺环酮在治疗肠-脑相互作用障碍(DGBIs),尤其是功能性消化不良方面显示出前景。然而,研究结果不一。
我们系统检索了4个数据库(Cochrane、PubMed、Scopus和PsycInfo)中测试丁螺环酮治疗任何上消化道DGBI的前瞻性研究。主要结局是任何经过验证的胃肠道症状测量指标。焦虑、抑郁和不良事件为次要结局。对于随机对照试验(RCT),我们对丁螺环酮组和对照组治疗后得分的标准化平均差(SMD)进行随机效应荟萃分析。使用Cochrane常见精神障碍抑郁焦虑和神经症组(CCDAN)量表评估RCT中的偏倚风险。
10项研究(n = 283)符合纳入标准,包括5项RCT、1项单病例试验、1项队列研究、1项病例系列研究和2项病例报告。丁螺环酮的耐受性良好。在荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,丁螺环酮在功能性消化不良/胃轻瘫症状方面的改善无统计学意义(SMD = -0.14;95%CI,-0.44至0.17;P = 0.39;I² = 0%;N = 3)。在个体症状方面,丁螺环酮比安慰剂更能改善腹胀严重程度(SMD = -0.41;95%CI,-0.77至-0.04;P = 0.03;N = 2),但不能改善餐后饱腹感(P = 0.24,N = 2)或恶心(P = 0.75,N = 2)。荟萃分析中纳入的所有RCT质量都很高,但大多数治疗仅4周。
我们发现,尽管研究规模较小,但丁螺环酮在改善功能性消化不良症状方面并不比安慰剂更有效。丁螺环酮对腹胀严重程度有好处,不过基于的研究较少。有必要针对更明确的群体,如腹胀患者,开展更大规模、更长时间的丁螺环酮试验。