Lobstein Tim, Gabrijelčič Mojca
World Obesity Federation, 3 Waterhouse Square, London, EC1N 2SW, England.
National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Jan 1;103(1):57-65. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292061. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
When policy-makers propose health-related initiatives they need to assess the impact on health inequalities, including disparities in diet-related diseases and obesity. Health impact assessments, including health equity assessments, can provide insights into the potential health outcomes, but they are usually based on engagement with stakeholders and beneficiaries and their quality is not easy to evaluate. In this paper, we propose a policy assessment tool designed to ask a set of questions on the impact on health equity of policies and interventions that may be answerable from empirical evidence or from public health principles. The results can be graded by strength of the impact and direction of the likely effects, and can provide a summary of how a policy or initiative may increase or decrease health inequity. The questions can be used as part of the scoping review for an impact assessment. We describe the application of this approach to the evaluation of three population-based policies to assess their likely impact on obesity inequalities: (i) policies to restrict children's exposure to the promotional marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages; (ii) policies on food and beverage reformulation; and (iii) policies to improve food procurement for public institutions.
当政策制定者提出与健康相关的倡议时,他们需要评估其对健康不平等的影响,包括与饮食相关疾病和肥胖方面的差异。健康影响评估,包括健康公平评估,能够提供有关潜在健康结果的见解,但通常基于与利益相关者和受益者的互动,其质量也不易评估。在本文中,我们提出了一种政策评估工具,旨在针对可能从实证证据或公共卫生原则中得到解答的政策和干预措施对健康公平的影响提出一系列问题。结果可以根据影响的强度和可能效果的方向进行分级,并能够总结一项政策或倡议可能如何增加或减少健康不平等。这些问题可作为影响评估范围界定审查的一部分。我们描述了这种方法在评估三项基于人群的政策以评估其对肥胖不平等可能产生的影响方面的应用:(i)限制儿童接触不健康食品和饮料促销营销的政策;(ii)食品和饮料配方改革政策;以及(iii)改善公共机构食品采购的政策。