Suppr超能文献

健康公平影响评估。

Health equity impact assessment.

作者信息

Povall Susan L, Haigh Fiona A, Abrahams Debbie, Scott-Samuel Alex

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation, Part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, A Unit of Population Health, Sydney and Sydney South West Local Health Districts, NSW Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2014 Dec;29(4):621-33. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat012. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Abstract

The World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health has called for 'health equity impact assessments' of all economic agreements, market regulation and public policies. We carried out an international study to clarify if existing health impact assessment (HIA) methods are adequate for the task of global health equity assessments. We triangulated data from a scoping review of the international literature, in-depth interviews with health equity and HIA experts and an international stakeholder workshop. We found that equity is not addressed adequately in HIAs for a variety of reasons, including inadequate guidance, absence of definitions, poor data and evidence, perceived lack of methods and tools and practitioner unwillingness or inability to address values like fairness and social justice. Current methods can address immediate, 'downstream' factors, but not the root causes of inequity. Extending HIAs to cover macro policy and global equity issues will require new tools to address macroeconomic policies, historical roots of inequities and upstream causes like power imbalances. More sensitive, participatory methods are also required. There is, however, no need for the development of a completely new methodology.

摘要

世界卫生组织健康问题社会决定因素委员会呼吁对所有经济协定、市场监管和公共政策进行“健康公平影响评估”。我们开展了一项国际研究,以明确现有的健康影响评估(HIA)方法是否足以胜任全球健康公平评估任务。我们综合了来自国际文献范围综述的数据、对健康公平和HIA专家的深入访谈以及一次国际利益相关方研讨会的数据。我们发现,由于各种原因,健康影响评估中对公平问题的处理不够充分,包括指导不足、缺乏定义、数据和证据不佳、认为缺乏方法和工具以及从业者不愿意或无法处理公平和社会正义等价值观问题。当前方法可以解决直接的“下游”因素,但无法解决不平等的根本原因。将健康影响评估扩展到涵盖宏观政策和全球公平问题,将需要新的工具来处理宏观经济政策、不平等的历史根源以及权力不平衡等上游原因。还需要更敏感、更具参与性的方法。然而,无需开发全新的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验