• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种冲洗系统Endovac与传统针头在乳牙根管清创效果的比较：一项研究。

Comparison of Debridement Efficacy of Two Irrigating Systems Endovac and Conventional Needle in Primary Tooth Root Canals: An Study.

作者信息

Yadav Preetika, Virdi Mandeep S, Saini Chandrika

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1219-1223. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3000. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3000
PMID:39781394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703774/
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well the Endovac system and conventional needle irrigation work to remove smear layers (SR) from primary teeth root canals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty extracted human primary teeth were divided into two equal sections vertically, then positioned within an acrylic model that was secured with screws. Group A (Endovac), = 25, and group B (traditional needle), = 25. Next, a uniform irrigation technique was used in every tooth embedded in the study model. Sections were examined with a 100× magnification stereomicroscope and electron microscope. Statistical tests were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Endovac removed the SR from the apical third of the root canal system more successfully than a traditional needle (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endovac has better performance than conventional needle irrigation in the removal of the SR in the deciduous teeth root canal system.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

(1) Removing the SR allows for more cleaning and disinfecting of root canal walls and better adaptation of root canal filling materials. (2) It is essential to remove the entire SR from the root dentin for successful endodontic treatment.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Yadav P, Virdi MS, Saini C. Comparison of Debridement Efficacy of Two Irrigating Systems Endovac and Conventional Needle in Primary Tooth Root Canals: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1219-1223.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估Endovac系统和传统针管冲洗在去除乳牙根管玷污层（SR）方面的效果。

材料与方法

将50颗拔除的人类乳牙垂直分成两个相等的部分，然后放置在用螺丝固定的丙烯酸模型中。A组（Endovac），n = 25，B组（传统针管），n = 25。接下来，对嵌入研究模型中的每颗牙齿采用统一的冲洗技术。切片用100倍放大的体视显微镜和电子显微镜检查。使用统计检验分析数据。

结果

Endovac在去除根管系统根尖三分之一处的玷污层方面比传统针管更成功（P<0.05）。

结论

在乳牙根管系统中去除玷污层方面，Endovac比传统针管冲洗表现更好。

临床意义

（1）去除玷污层可使根管壁得到更彻底的清洁和消毒，并使根管充填材料更好地贴合。（2）为成功进行牙髓治疗，必须从牙根牙本质上去除整个玷污层。

如何引用本文

Yadav P, Virdi MS, Saini C. 两种冲洗系统Endovac和传统针管在乳牙根管清创效果的比较：一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024；17(11):1219 - 1223。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/8acc344a240f/ijcpd-17-1219-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/88169e8950b5/ijcpd-17-1219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/aad1516af075/ijcpd-17-1219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/a249f1edb116/ijcpd-17-1219-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/b356ca89dd2c/ijcpd-17-1219-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/fe4bbeedc08c/ijcpd-17-1219-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/b4686caaccbc/ijcpd-17-1219-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/227647e5f5bb/ijcpd-17-1219-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/8acc344a240f/ijcpd-17-1219-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/88169e8950b5/ijcpd-17-1219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/aad1516af075/ijcpd-17-1219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/a249f1edb116/ijcpd-17-1219-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/b356ca89dd2c/ijcpd-17-1219-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/fe4bbeedc08c/ijcpd-17-1219-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/b4686caaccbc/ijcpd-17-1219-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/227647e5f5bb/ijcpd-17-1219-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc2/11703774/8acc344a240f/ijcpd-17-1219-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Debridement Efficacy of Two Irrigating Systems Endovac and Conventional Needle in Primary Tooth Root Canals: An Study.两种冲洗系统Endovac与传统针头在乳牙根管清创效果的比较：一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1219-1223. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3000. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.EndoVac系统与传统针管冲洗法在去除乳磨牙根管内玷污层方面的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;20(9):1168-1174. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.181351.
3
Conventional to EndoVac: A Comparative Evaluation of Two Irrigation Systems in Microbial Reduction of Primary Root Canals Using Chemical Irrigants: An Study.从传统冲洗法到EndoVac冲洗法：使用化学冲洗剂对两种冲洗系统在减少初诊根管内微生物方面的比较性评估：一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Sep;16(Suppl 2):113-117. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2565.
4
Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study.使用EndoVac与传统针管冲洗法清除根管壁碎屑的比较评估：一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):432-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123019.
5
Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.Endovac冲洗系统与传统冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的比较：一项体外研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Sep;112(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.主动与被动根管冲洗系统的清创效果与根尖挤出率比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.
7
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.使用不同冲洗系统（EndoActivator、EndoVac和被动超声冲洗）去除玷污层和清洁根管：一项体外研究的场发射扫描电子显微镜评估
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
8
SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.SEM 评价不同根管冲洗设备对玷污层去除的效果：一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):184-188.
9
Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals.新型根尖负压冲洗系统与传统冲洗针在根管内冲洗效果的比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.050.
10
Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study.采用不同冲洗激活系统评估根管冲洗剂的清除玷污层效果和渗透深度：一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):331-334. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3626.

本文引用的文献

1
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除：超声和声波冲洗激活技术的比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051.
2
Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals.弯曲根管中玷污层去除方案的评估
Aust Endod J. 2014 Aug;40(2):66-71. doi: 10.1111/aej.12038. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
3
Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth.
乳磨牙的解剖学挑战、电子工作长度测定及根管预备的当前进展
Int Endod J. 2013 Nov;46(11):1011-22. doi: 10.1111/iej.12134. Epub 2013 May 25.
4
The influence of smear layer removal on primary tooth pulpectomy outcome: a 24-month, double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial evaluation.清除玷污层对乳牙髓腔治疗效果的影响：一项为期 24 个月的双盲、随机、对照临床试验评估。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;22(5):369-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01210.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
5
Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study.Endoflas、氧化锌丁香酚和Metapex作为乳磨牙根管充填材料的一项比较性临床研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):365-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.1377v06621143233.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果：扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
7
Effect of ozone on oral cells compared with established antimicrobials.与已有的抗菌剂相比，臭氧对口腔细胞的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2006 Oct;114(5):435-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00390.x.
8
Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars.乳牙根管治疗的成功率
J Dent. 2005 Jan;33(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.009.
9
Antimicrobial effect of ozonated water on bacteria invading dentinal tubules.臭氧水对侵入牙本质小管细菌的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2004 Nov;30(11):778-81. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200411000-00007.
10
Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals.根管预备技术和冲洗方案在减少根管内细菌数量方面的疗效。
J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009.