Siqueira José F, Rôças Isabela N, Santos Sandra R L D, Lima Kenio C, Magalhães Fernando A C, de Uzeda Milton
Oral Microbiology Laboratory, Institute of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009.
The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro intracanal bacterial reduction produced by using two instrumentation techniques and different irrigation methods. Root canals inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis were prepared by using the following techniques and irrigants: alternated rotary motions (ARM) technique, hand nickel-titanium files and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as irrigant; ARM technique and combined irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and citric acid; ARM technique and combined irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate; and Greater Taper rotary files, using 2.5% NaOCl as irrigant. Controls were instrumented by using the ARM technique and irrigated with sterile saline. Canals were sampled before and after preparation. After serial dilution, samples were plated onto Mitis-Salivarius agar, and the colony forming units that were grown were counted. All test techniques and solutions significantly reduced the number of bacterial cells within the root canal (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the experimental groups (p > 0.05). Nonetheless, all of them were significantly more effective than the control group (p < 0.05). These findings support the importance of using antimicrobial irrigants during the chemomechanical preparation, regardless of the solutions or instrumentation techniques used.
本研究的目的是比较两种根管预备技术及不同冲洗方法在体外对根管内细菌的减少作用。用粪肠球菌接种根管,采用以下技术和冲洗液进行预备:交替旋转运动(ARM)技术、手动镍钛锉及2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)作为冲洗液;ARM技术以及2.5% NaOCl与柠檬酸联合冲洗;ARM技术以及2.5% NaOCl与2%葡萄糖酸氯己定联合冲洗;大锥度旋转锉,使用2.5% NaOCl作为冲洗液。对照组采用ARM技术预备并用无菌盐水冲洗。在预备前后对根管取样。经系列稀释后,将样本接种于轻唾琼脂平板上,对生长的菌落形成单位进行计数。所有测试技术和溶液均显著减少了根管内细菌细胞数量(p < 0.05)。各实验组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。然而,所有实验组均显著比对照组更有效(p < 0.05)。这些研究结果支持了在化学机械预备过程中使用抗菌冲洗液的重要性,无论使用何种溶液或预备技术。