Olsen Jonathan Winther, Jensen Christian Bredgaard, Bunyoz Kristine Ifigenia, Bagge Anders Flygenring, Gromov Kirill, Troelsen Anders
Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jan 9;96:19-25. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42575.
In contemporary medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA), non-lateral patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) is not considered a contraindication. However, we still lack knowledge on the association of PFOA severity on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after mUKA. We aimed to examine the association between PFOA severity and PROM-score changes after mUKA.
We included 549 mobile-bearing mUKAs. PFOA was graded intraoperatively as 0 = normal cartilage, 1-2 = superficial changes or < 50% of depth, and 3-4 = changes of > 50% of depth or to the bone, using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) cartilage lesion classification system. All patients completed the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Activity and Participation Questionnaire (APQ), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), preoperatively and 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. PROM changes were compared using linear regression models adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, and preoperative PROM score.
We found no significant differences in OKS, FJS, and APQ change when comparing group 3-4 with group 0 at any follow-up. When comparing group 1-2 with 0 we found a statistical but not clinical significantly higher change in OKS scores at 24-month follow-up (2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-4.6) and in APQ scores at 24-month follow-up (10.6, CI 1.2-20.0) in favor of group 1-2.
Severe PFOA, excluding severe lateral facet PFOA, had no negative association on PROM score development following mobile-bearing mUKA.
在当代内侧单髁膝关节置换术(mUKA)中,非外侧髌股骨关节炎(PFOA)不被视为禁忌证。然而,我们仍缺乏关于mUKA后PFOA严重程度与患者报告结局指标(PROMs)之间关联的认识。我们旨在研究mUKA后PFOA严重程度与PROM评分变化之间的关联。
我们纳入了549例活动平台mUKA病例。术中使用国际软骨修复协会(ICRS)软骨损伤分类系统将PFOA分级为0 = 软骨正常,1 - 2 = 表面改变或深度小于50%,3 - 4 = 深度改变大于50%或累及骨质。所有患者在术前以及术后3、12和24个月完成牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、活动与参与问卷(APQ)以及遗忘关节评分(FJS)。使用针对性别、年龄、体重指数和术前PROM评分进行调整的线性回归模型比较PROM变化。
在任何随访时间将3 - 4组与0组进行比较时,我们发现OKS、FJS和APQ变化无显著差异。将1 - 2组与0组进行比较时,我们发现在24个月随访时OKS评分有统计学意义但无临床显著更高的变化(2.5,95%置信区间[CI] 0.36 - 4.6),以及在24个月随访时APQ评分有统计学意义但无临床显著更高的变化(10.6,CI 1.2 - 20.0),更有利于1 - 2组。
除严重外侧小面PFOA外,严重PFOA对活动平台mUKA后的PROM评分发展无负面关联。