Suppr超能文献

高斯白噪声对医学生准确识别肺部声音能力的影响。

Influence of Gaussian White Noise on Medical Students' Capacity to Accurately Identify Pulmonary Sounds.

作者信息

Razvadauskas Haroldas, Razvadauskienė Jurgita, Aliulis Martynas, Aliulytė Rūta, Naudžiūnas Albinas, Paukštaitienė Renata, Sadauskas Saulius

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Primary Health Care Centre, Babtai, Kaunas raj., Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2024;26(123):474-482. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_98_24. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of background noise on auscultation accuracy for different lung sound classes under standardised conditions, especially at lower to medium levels, remains largely unexplored. This article aims to evaluate the impact of three levels of Gaussian white noise (GWN) on the ability to identify three classes of lung sounds.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A pre-post pilot study assessing the impact of GWN on a group of students' ability to identify lung sounds was conducted. The three intensities were applied to the three classes of lung sounds: no GWN, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR-40 (medium level) and SNR-20 (high). This resulted with three exams, each containing nine questions. Fifty-two participants underwent a 4-day training programme and were tested on their identification of lung sound classes under the three levels of GWN, but seven subjects were excluded for not completing all three assessments. Statistical analysis was performed on 45 subjects, using non-parametric tests to analyse the data. A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The GWN did not impact the overall lung sound identification capacity of medical students, with consistent scores of 66.7% across the three noise levels for all three lung sound classes combined. However, when considering sound classes separately, GWN affected the identification of normal (NAS) and discontinuous (DAS), but not continuous (CAS) types. Exam scores for NAS varied significantly across the three noise levels, with respective scores of 66.7%, 100% and 66.7%. Scores for DAS also varied, revealing 66.7%, 33.3% and 66.7%.

CONCLUSION

This study introduces a standardised simulation-based approach to investigate the effect of GWN on the accuracy of auscultation amongst medical students. Findings indicate that whilst CAS sounds are robust to background noise, the identification of NAS and DAS sounds can be compromised. The medium noise levels (SNR-40) of noise pollution had the greatest effect on the DAS lung sounds.

摘要

背景

在标准化条件下,背景噪声对不同类别肺音听诊准确性的影响,尤其是在中低水平噪声下,在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。本文旨在评估三种高斯白噪声(GWN)水平对识别三类肺音能力的影响。

方法与材料

开展了一项前后对照的预试验研究,评估GWN对一组学生识别肺音能力的影响。将三种强度的噪声应用于三类肺音:无GWN、信噪比(SNR)、SNR-40(中等水平)和SNR-20(高水平)。这产生了三场考试,每场考试包含九个问题。52名参与者接受了为期4天的培训计划,并在三种GWN水平下接受了肺音类别识别测试,但有7名受试者因未完成所有三项评估而被排除。对45名受试者进行了统计分析,使用非参数检验分析数据。P值为0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

GWN并未影响医学生识别肺音的总体能力,所有三类肺音在三种噪声水平下的综合得分均为66.7%。然而,当分别考虑各类声音时,GWN影响了正常(NAS)和间断(DAS)类声音的识别,但不影响连续(CAS)类声音的识别。NAS的考试成绩在三种噪声水平下差异显著分别为66.7%、100%和66.7%。DAS的成绩也有所不同,分别为66.7%、33.3%和66.7%。

结论

本研究引入了一种基于标准化模拟的方法来研究GWN对医学生听诊准确性的影响。研究结果表明,虽然CAS声音对背景噪声具有较强的抗性,但NAS和DAS声音的识别可能会受到影响。中等噪声水平(SNR-40)的噪声污染对DAS肺音的影响最大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/804f/11813236/95e5661b5782/NH-26-474-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验