Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 23;13(1):1289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27399-5.
Auscultation, a cost-effective and non-invasive part of physical examination, is essential to diagnose pediatric respiratory disorders. Electronic stethoscopes allow transmission, storage, and analysis of lung sounds. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to classify pediatric respiratory sounds. Lung sounds were digitally recorded during routine physical examinations at a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic from July to November 2019 and labeled as normal, crackles, or wheezing. Ensemble support vector machine models were trained and evaluated for four classification tasks (normal vs. abnormal, crackles vs. wheezing, normal vs. crackles, and normal vs. wheezing) using K-fold cross-validation (K = 10). Model performance on a prospective validation set (June to July 2021) was compared with those of pediatricians and non-pediatricians. Total 680 clips were used for training and internal validation. The model accuracies during internal validation for normal vs. abnormal, crackles vs. wheezing, normal vs. crackles, and normal vs. wheezing were 83.68%, 83.67%, 80.94%, and 90.42%, respectively. The prospective validation (n = 90) accuracies were 82.22%, 67.74%, 67.80%, and 81.36%, respectively, which were comparable to pediatrician and non-pediatrician performance. An automated classification model of pediatric lung sounds is feasible and maybe utilized as a screening tool for respiratory disorders in this pandemic era.
听诊是体格检查中一种具有成本效益且非侵入性的方法,对于诊断儿科呼吸疾病至关重要。电子听诊器可实现肺部声音的传输、存储和分析。我们旨在开发一种机器学习模型来对儿科呼吸音进行分类。2019 年 7 月至 11 月,在儿科肺病门诊进行常规体格检查期间,对肺部声音进行了数字化记录,并标记为正常、爆裂声或喘鸣。使用 K 折交叉验证(K=10)对正常与异常、爆裂声与喘鸣、正常与爆裂声以及正常与喘鸣等四个分类任务的集成支持向量机模型进行了训练和评估。在 2021 年 6 月至 7 月的前瞻性验证集中,比较了模型在预测方面的表现与儿科医生和非儿科医生的表现。总共使用了 680 个剪辑进行训练和内部验证。在内部验证中,模型对正常与异常、爆裂声与喘鸣、正常与爆裂声以及正常与喘鸣的准确率分别为 83.68%、83.67%、80.94%和 90.42%。前瞻性验证(n=90)的准确率分别为 82.22%、67.74%、67.80%和 81.36%,与儿科医生和非儿科医生的表现相当。儿科肺部声音的自动分类模型是可行的,也许可以在这个大流行时代用作呼吸疾病的筛查工具。