Liang Wayne H, Hoffman Jeffrey M, McNeely Lia, Proctor Stephon, Orenstein Evan W
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):418-428. doi: 10.1055/a-2512-9647. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Engagement of clinicians who understand clinical workflows and technology constraints can accelerate the development and implementation of better electronic health record (EHR) designs that improve quality and reduce burnout. Provider builder programs can accelerate clinical informatics education for a broader coalition of clinical specialties.
In this State of the Art/Best Practice paper, we aim to (1) propose a provider builder maturity model informed by the experience of three institutions using a single EHR vendor (Epic Systems) and (2) describe the program elements and relationships necessary to advance along this model to yield organizational benefits.
We used a modified version of the Glaser State-of-the-Art approach, gathering consensus among a small group of experts at institutions with successful provider builder programs. The model was updated through meetings with a larger group of experts and then feedback from presentation at national conferences and the American Medical Informatics Association's Maturity Model Working Group.
The final maturity model describes the characteristics and suggested next steps beginning from Planting the Seed (Stage 0) and progressing through Lone Wolves (Stage 1), a Community of Builders (Stage 2), Organizational Structure (Stage 3), a Council of Builders (Stage 4), and Informatics in the Room Where it Happens (Stage 5). We also describe the journeys of three organizations through these stages.
A provider builder maturity model can help guide organizations on their journey engaging clinicians in collaborative EHR design to promote quality and safety and reduce burnout.
让了解临床工作流程和技术限制的临床医生参与进来,可以加速开发和实施更好的电子健康记录(EHR)设计,从而提高质量并减少职业倦怠。提供者构建者计划可以加速针对更广泛临床专业联盟的临床信息学教育。
在这篇技术现状/最佳实践论文中,我们旨在(1)根据三个使用单一EHR供应商(Epic Systems)的机构的经验,提出一个提供者构建者成熟度模型,以及(2)描述沿着该模型前进以产生组织效益所需的计划要素和关系。
我们使用了Glaser技术现状方法的修改版本,在拥有成功的提供者构建者计划的机构的一小群专家中达成共识。通过与更大规模的专家小组开会,然后从在全国会议和美国医学信息学协会成熟度模型工作组的报告中获得反馈,对模型进行了更新。
最终的成熟度模型描述了从播种(阶段0)开始,经过孤狼(阶段1)、构建者社区(阶段2)、组织结构(阶段3)、构建者委员会(阶段4)以及在实际发生的地方实现信息学(阶段5)的特征和建议的后续步骤。我们还描述了三个组织在这些阶段的历程。
提供者构建者成熟度模型可以帮助指导组织在让临床医生参与协作式EHR设计以促进质量和安全并减少职业倦怠的过程中前行。