Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合体外冲击波碎石术治疗巨大胆囊结石:一项初步研究。

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the removal of large gallbladder stones: a pilot study.

作者信息

Zhu Liang, He Jinli, Yang Zhenzhen, Huang Xi, Hong Junbo, Zhou Xiaojiang, Chen Youxiang, Li Guohua

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No.17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03590-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy (EGPC) has become an alternative option for treating cholecystolithiasis. However, developing a new method of EGPC in which the gallbladder wall is not damaged remains a challenge. This study introduced a new EGPC method called endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), which preserves the integrity of the gallbladder wall in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

In total, six patients (aged 23-72 years, 3 males and 3 females, Han ethnicity) who had large gallbladder stones (diameter ≥ 1 cm) complicated with common bile duct (CBD) stones and who underwent ERCP combined with ESWL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2022 to December 2022 were enrolled. The patients' clinical characteristics, endoscopic treatment and follow-up data were analyzed. A paired t test was performed to compare the differences in the main serological indicators before and after EGPC.

RESULTS

Of the six patients, five completed EGPC, and one failed due to intolerable abdominal pain during ESWL and was subsequently transferred to surgery. With respect to post-EGPC adverse events, one patient developed mild post-ERCP pancreatitis, and no other adverse events occurred. Both the technical success rate and clinical success rate of ERCP combined with ESWL were 83.3% and the incidence of adverse events was 16.7%. The six patients were followed up for an average of 24 months, during which only one patient experienced a recurrence of gallbladder stones at the 3-month follow-up, but no gallbladder stones were found at the 6-month follow-up after oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP combined with ESWL is a potentially safe and effective treatment for large gallbladder stones.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry site. [Registration number: ChiCTR2200060927 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ); registration date: June 14, 2022].

摘要

背景

内镜保胆取石术(EGPC)已成为治疗胆囊结石的一种替代选择。然而,开发一种不损伤胆囊壁的新型EGPC方法仍然是一项挑战。本研究介绍了一种名为内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)联合体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的新型EGPC方法,该方法在治疗合并胆总管结石的胆囊结石时可保持胆囊壁的完整性。

方法

选取2022年7月至2022年12月在南昌大学第一附属医院接受ERCP联合ESWL治疗的6例患者(年龄23 - 72岁,男3例,女3例,汉族),这些患者患有大的胆囊结石(直径≥1 cm)且合并胆总管结石。分析患者的临床特征、内镜治疗及随访数据。采用配对t检验比较EGPC前后主要血清学指标的差异。

结果

6例患者中,5例完成EGPC,1例因ESWL期间腹痛难以忍受而失败,随后转手术治疗。关于EGPC术后不良事件,1例患者发生轻度ERCP术后胰腺炎,未发生其他不良事件。ERCP联合ESWL的技术成功率和临床成功率均为83.3%,不良事件发生率为16.7%。6例患者平均随访24个月,在此期间,仅1例患者在3个月随访时出现胆囊结石复发,但在口服熊去氧胆酸6个月随访时未发现胆囊结石。

结论

ERCP联合ESWL是治疗大胆囊结石的一种潜在安全有效的方法。

试验注册

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心网站注册。[注册号:ChiCTR2200060927(http://www.chictr.org.cn/);注册日期:2022年6月14日]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee1/11715249/bbe230bb545d/12876_2025_3590_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验