• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健专业人员对儿童权利的理解:对实证证据基础的系统评价。

Healthcare professionals' understanding of children's rights: a systematic review of the empirical evidence-base.

作者信息

Alshammari Sahar Mazied, Linden Mark A, Kerr Helen, Noble Helen

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, 2440, Saudi Arabia.

Medical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 10;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02756-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-025-02756-9
PMID:39794844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720330/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of children's rights emerged during the 1980s and emphasised the role of children as active participants in matters which concern them.

AIM

This review aims to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence base on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding of children's rights.

METHODS

Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science) were systematically searched in May 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to quality appraise full-text papers included in the review. A descriptive narrative synthesis of the studies' findings was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 relevant studies from 10 countries were identified and included in the review. The number of participants included ranged from 6 to 1048 for HCPs with a broad range of sampling methods. Based on the narrative synthesis of the included studies, three main themes were identified: (1) Barriers to implementing children's rights in healthcare, (2) Factors that contribute to children's rights implementation, and (3) Study instruments used to measure outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

HCPs require a better understanding of children's rights to implement these rights into practice. Listening to children, building trusting relationships with children, and continuing professional development of HCPs could help to address barriers to understanding children's rights. There is a pressing need for the development of a tool that is capable of tracking changes in the understanding of children's rights in healthcare environments as efforts to increase awareness become more widely recognised.

摘要

背景

儿童权利的概念在20世纪80年代出现,强调儿童在涉及其自身事务中作为积极参与者的角色。

目的

本综述旨在识别和综合关于医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对儿童权利理解的实证证据基础。

方法

2023年5月系统检索了五个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO和科学网)。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对纳入综述的全文论文进行质量评估。对研究结果进行了描述性叙述性综合分析。

结果

共识别出10个国家的15项相关研究并纳入综述。医疗保健专业人员的参与者数量从6人到1048人不等,采用了广泛的抽样方法。基于纳入研究的叙述性综合分析,确定了三个主要主题:(1)医疗保健中实施儿童权利的障碍,(2)有助于儿童权利实施的因素,以及(3)用于衡量结果的研究工具。

结论

医疗保健专业人员需要更好地理解儿童权利,以便将这些权利付诸实践。倾听儿童的声音、与儿童建立信任关系以及医疗保健专业人员的持续专业发展有助于消除理解儿童权利的障碍。随着提高认识的努力得到更广泛认可,迫切需要开发一种能够跟踪医疗保健环境中对儿童权利理解变化的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3054/11720330/486400ac59ce/13643_2025_2756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3054/11720330/486400ac59ce/13643_2025_2756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3054/11720330/486400ac59ce/13643_2025_2756_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare professionals' understanding of children's rights: a systematic review of the empirical evidence-base.医疗保健专业人员对儿童权利的理解:对实证证据基础的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 10;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02756-9.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Children's rights in pediatrics.儿科中的儿童权利。
Eur J Pediatr. 2011 Jan;170(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1205-8. Epub 2010 May 12.
4
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Assessing the Respect of Children's Rights in Pediatric Hospitals.评估儿科医院对儿童权利的尊重。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 16;59(5):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050955.
6
Primary Care Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards Promoting the Reduction of Children's Secondhand Smoke Exposure: A Mixed-Methods Review and Synthesis.初级保健医疗保健专业人员在促进减少儿童二手烟暴露方面的知识、态度和实践:混合方法综述和综合。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):398-408. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx278.
7
Using international human rights law to improve child health in low-income countries: a framework for healthcare professionals.利用国际人权法改善低收入国家儿童健康:医疗保健专业人员框架
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Mar 30;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0083-1.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: A systematic review.影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施药物风险沟通的因素:系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jan;19(1):28-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Children's participation rights and the role of pediatric healthcare teams: A critical review.儿童参与权与儿科医护团队的角色:批判性回顾。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;77:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.02.023. Epub 2024 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Implementation and Awareness of Children's Rights in Pediatric Hospital: A Comparative Study of Parents' and Children's Perspectives.评估儿童医院儿童权利的实施与认知:一项关于家长和儿童观点的比较研究
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Jun 8;17(3):64. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17030064.
2
"Fox-like. One eye open, one eye closed": child supervision among Syrian refugee mothers in Canada.“似狐。一只眼睁着,一只眼闭着”:加拿大叙利亚难民母亲中的儿童监管情况
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;16:1548646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548646. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting children's rights to health and well-being in the United States.在美国促进儿童的健康和幸福权利。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Aug 18;25:100577. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100577. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Assessing the Respect of Children's Rights in Pediatric Hospitals.评估儿科医院对儿童权利的尊重。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 16;59(5):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050955.
3
Identifying challenges in implementing child rights instruments in Nigeria: A nationwide survey of knowledge, perception, and practice of child rights among doctors and nurses.
识别在尼日利亚实施儿童权利文书方面的挑战:对医生和护士儿童权利知识、看法和实践的全国性调查。
Ann Afr Med. 2023 Apr-Jun;22(2):189-203. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_169_22.
4
Exploring the voices of children and children's nurses in hospital: implications for nursing practice.探讨医院中儿童和儿童护士的声音:对护理实践的启示。
Nurs Child Young People. 2023 Sep 7;35(5):22-27. doi: 10.7748/ncyp.2023.e1447. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers' views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access.一项关于农村医疗服务提供者对医疗服务获取的社会、文化和项目障碍的看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2.
6
Addressing language as a barrier to healthcare access and quality.解决语言问题对医疗服务可及性和质量的阻碍。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec 31;72(714):4-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X718013. Print 2022 Jan.
7
A qualitative study of child participation in decision-making: Exploring rights-based approaches in pediatric occupational therapy.儿童参与决策的质性研究:探索儿科作业治疗中的基于权利的方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260975. eCollection 2021.
8
How children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis view participation and communication in healthcare encounters: a qualitative study.儿童青少年特发性关节炎患者如何看待医疗保健中的参与和沟通:一项定性研究。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021 Nov 2;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00642-x.
9
How are children's best interests expressed during their hospital visit?-An observational study.如何在儿童住院期间表达他们的最大利益?一项观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(23-24):3644-3656. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15886. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.