• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华北地区林麝和狍的排便位点偏好与空间生态隔离

Defecation Site Preferences and Spatial Ecological Segregation of Forest Musk Deer and Siberian Roe Deer in North China.

作者信息

Li Yixin, Hai Luyao, Luo Pengfei, Zheng Wangshan, Jin Xuelin, Liu Jiangcheng, Wang Haiyan, Hu Defu

机构信息

School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100107, China.

Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi'an 710032, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ani15010061.

DOI:10.3390/ani15010061
PMID:39795004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11718876/
Abstract

The forest musk deer () and Siberian roe deer () are browsers with a broad sympatric distribution in North and Southwest China. However, little is known about their spatial utilization of microhabitats and habitats. This study, conducted on Huanglong Mountain in China, analyzed the defecation site distribution, indicating preferences of forest musk deer and Siberian roe deer for their habitat demands. Using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), we compared the defecation site preferences of both species and further examined their spatial utilization patterns. The results indicated that the primary factors influencing defecation site preferences for forest musk deer were slope (15.79%), elevation (4.26%), herbaceous cover (19.93%), herb height (33.73%), and tree diversity (15.64%). Conversely, for Siberian roe deer, elevation (54.63%) and herbaceous cover (29.31%) were the key factors. Significant differences were found in elevation ( < 0.001) and herbaceous diversity ( < 0.01) between the defecation sites of the two species, with additional notable differences in slope position, tree diversity, and average tree height ( < 0.05). Furthermore, forest musk deer primarily utilized broadleaf forests, coniferous forests, mixed conifer-broadleaf forests, and sparse woodlands. In contrast, Siberian roe deer utilized broadleaf forests, sparse woodlands, and coniferous forests, showing a significant difference ( = 0.01). These findings suggest distinct spatial ecological segregation between forest musk deer and Siberian roe deer regarding their microhabitat preferences and vegetation type utilization at the habitat scale.

摘要

林麝(Moschus berezovskii)和狍(Capreolus pygargus)是在中国北方和西南部广泛同域分布的食草动物。然而,对于它们对微生境和栖息地的空间利用情况却知之甚少。本研究在中国黄龙山区开展,分析了粪便排泄位点分布,以表明林麝和狍对其栖息地需求的偏好。我们使用广义线性混合模型(GLMMs)比较了两种动物的粪便排泄位点偏好,并进一步研究了它们的空间利用模式。结果表明,影响林麝粪便排泄位点偏好的主要因素是坡度(15.79%)、海拔(4.26%)、草本植物覆盖度(19.93%)、草本植物高度(33.73%)和树木多样性(15.64%)。相反,对于狍来说,海拔(54.63%)和草本植物覆盖度(29.31%)是关键因素。在两种动物的粪便排泄位点之间,海拔(P < 0.001)和草本植物多样性(P < 0.01)存在显著差异,在坡位、树木多样性和平均树高方面也存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。此外,林麝主要利用阔叶林、针叶林、针阔混交林和稀疏林地。相比之下,狍利用阔叶林、稀疏林地和针叶林,两者存在显著差异(P = 0.01)。这些发现表明,林麝和狍在栖息地尺度上对微生境偏好和植被类型利用方面存在明显的空间生态隔离。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/5d16abfb37fb/animals-15-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/a35b3dc8ce63/animals-15-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/17f6794e0b5e/animals-15-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/5d16abfb37fb/animals-15-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/a35b3dc8ce63/animals-15-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/17f6794e0b5e/animals-15-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11718876/5d16abfb37fb/animals-15-00061-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Defecation Site Preferences and Spatial Ecological Segregation of Forest Musk Deer and Siberian Roe Deer in North China.华北地区林麝和狍的排便位点偏好与空间生态隔离
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ani15010061.
2
Effects of vegetation type differences induced by human disturbance on the nutrition strategy and gut microbiota of Siberian roe deer.人为干扰引起的植被类型差异对狍营养策略及肠道微生物群的影响
Mol Ecol. 2023 May;32(10):2534-2550. doi: 10.1111/mec.16775. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
3
Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer .喜马拉雅麝的生态关联因素
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 24;9(1):4-18. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4435. eCollection 2019 Jan.
4
Comparison of Foraging Strategies and Effects of the Wapiti and Siberian Roe Deer on Japanese Yew.马鹿和狍子对日本红豆杉的觅食策略及影响比较
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e70451. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70451. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Population Genetic Characteristics of Siberian Roe Deer in the Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystem of the Greater Khingan Mountains, Northeast China.中国东北大兴安岭寒温带森林生态系统中狍的种群遗传特征
Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 16;13(11):935. doi: 10.3390/biology13110935.
6
Genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) populations from Asia.亚洲狍(Capreolus pygargus)种群的遗传多样性与遗传结构
BMC Genet. 2015 Aug 18;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0244-6.
7
Whole-genome sequencing of wild Siberian musk deer (Moschus moschiferus) provides insights into its genetic features.对野生西伯利亚麝香鹿(Moschus moschiferus)的全基因组测序为其遗传特征提供了深入了解。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6495-2.
8
Occurrence, genetic diversity and zoonotic potential of Blastocystis sp. in forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) in Southwest China.中国西南地区林麝(Moschus berezovskii)中 Blastocystis sp. 的发生、遗传多样性和人畜共患潜力。
Parasite. 2022;29:34. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2022037. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
9
Weak population structure in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and evidence of introgressive hybridization with Siberian roe deer (C. pygargus) in northeastern Poland.欧洲狍(Capreolus capreolus)的种群结构薄弱以及在波兰东北部与西伯利亚狍(C. pygargus)发生渐渗杂交的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 1;9(10):e109147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109147. eCollection 2014.
10
Musk deer (Moschus spp.) face redistribution to higher elevations and latitudes under climate change in China.在中国气候变化的影响下,麝(Moschus spp.)面临着向更高海拔和纬度重新分布的挑战。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135335. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135335. Epub 2019 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of 101 patients with urea cycle disorders in China.中国101例尿素循环障碍患者的临床特征及长期预后
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 13;20(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03985-w.
2
Insights into thermal stress effects on performance and behavior of grazing cattle via multimodal sensor monitoring.通过多模态传感器监测深入了解热应激对放牧牛的生产性能和行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 31;15(1):27941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13264-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatio-temporal distribution and overlap of and in Gongga Mountain, Sichuan, China.中国四川贡嘎山地区 和 的时空分布及重叠。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Jun;34(6):1630-1638. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202306.031.
2
mtDNA CR Evidence Indicates High Genetic Diversity of Captive Forest Musk Deer in Shaanxi Province, China.线粒体DNA控制区证据表明中国陕西省圈养林麝具有高度遗传多样性。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;13(13):2191. doi: 10.3390/ani13132191.
3
Camera trap reveals the co-occurrence patterns of two sympatric muntjac species in southern Anhui Province, China: No spatial segregation.
相机陷阱揭示了中国安徽省南部两种同域麂类物种的共存模式:不存在空间隔离。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec 3;11(24):17801-17809. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8307. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Musk deer (Moschus spp.) face redistribution to higher elevations and latitudes under climate change in China.在中国气候变化的影响下,麝(Moschus spp.)面临着向更高海拔和纬度重新分布的挑战。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135335. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135335. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
5
Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer .喜马拉雅麝的生态关联因素
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 24;9(1):4-18. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4435. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system.反刍动物生态生理适应与多样化的进化步骤:其消化系统的比较视角
Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(4):443-457. doi: 10.1007/BF00378733.
7
The Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in High-grade Nonmetastatic Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A SEER Analysis.辅助放疗在高级别非转移性腹膜后软组织肉瘤中的益处:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar;41(3):274-279. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000259.
8
Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?栖息地选择的相关性和研究:问题、误导还是机遇?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2233-44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0079.
9
Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores.食肉动物之间的物种共存与性状趋异
Ecol Lett. 2007 Feb;10(2):146-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01005.x.
10
Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces.非洲领地性羚羊的气味标记:II. 粪便标记的经济学原理
Anim Behav. 1999 Jan;57(1):11-17. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0942.