Kamio Ana Beatriz Sato, da Silva Barboza Andressa, da Silva Maria Eduarda Broering, Soto Artur Ferronato, de Andrade Juliana Silva Ribeiro, Duque Thais Mageste, da Cruz Ariadne Cristiane Cabral, Mazzon Ricardo Ruiz, Badaró Maurício Malheiros
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Av. Delsino Conti, s/n-Trindade, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Av. Delfino Conti, s/n-Trindade, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;17(1):8. doi: 10.3390/polym17010008.
This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of different disinfection protocols for dentures by combining methods, varying intervention sequences, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) concentrations (0.1% and 0.25%), and post-exposure to intraoral temperature. The heat-polymerized poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) was divided into groups (n = 15): control (C, distilled water immersion), B (brushing), I0.1% and I0.25% (isolated NaOCl immersion), B + I0.1% and B + I0.25% (brushing followed by immersion), I + B0.1% and I + B0.25% (immersion followed by brushing), and B + I0.1% + T and B + I0.25% + T (brushing, NaOCl immersion, and overnight exposure to 35 °C ± 2 °C). The post-disinfection exposure to intraoral temperature simulated the denture use during sleeping time. Quantitative evaluation was performed by colony-forming unit (CFU/mL) counting of and qualitative analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Data were processed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test to compare different protocols at the same concentration and among groups (α ≤ 0.05). Applying 0.25% NaOCl in associated protocols, the intervention sequence was no different (B + I and I + B) and caused the lowest counts. The 0.1% NaOCl lost part of its action when the immersion method started the protocols. B + I0.25%, I0.25% + B, and B + I0.1% had similar antimicrobial efficacy, but the intraoral temperature (B + I + T) reduced the efficacy of these protocols, regardless of NaOCl concentration. Residual biofilm recolonization was also detected in SEM images. In conclusion, all the combinations between mechanical and chemical methods using 0.25% NaOCl were the most effective against . The antimicrobial efficacy of NaOCl at 0.1% changes depending on the intervention sequence. The intraoral temperature influenced the recolonization after the disinfection protocols.
本研究旨在通过结合不同方法、改变干预顺序、使用不同浓度的次氯酸钠(NaOCl,0.1%和0.25%)以及暴露于口腔内温度后,评估不同假牙消毒方案的抗菌效果。将热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)分为若干组(n = 15):对照组(C,蒸馏水浸泡)、B组(刷牙)、I0.1%组和I0.25%组(单独NaOCl浸泡)、B + I0.1%组和B + I0.25%组(先刷牙后浸泡)、I + B0.1%组和I + B0.25%组(先浸泡后刷牙),以及B + I0.1% + T组和B + I0.25% + T组(刷牙、NaOCl浸泡,并在35 °C ± 2 °C下过夜暴露)。消毒后暴露于口腔内温度模拟了假牙在睡眠时间的使用情况。通过菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)计数进行定量评估,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像进行定性分析。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行处理,以比较相同浓度下不同方案以及各分组之间的差异(α ≤ 0.05)。在相关方案中应用0.25%的NaOCl时,干预顺序(B + I和I + B)没有差异,且导致菌落计数最低。当浸泡法开始方案时,0.1%的NaOCl失去了部分作用。B + I0.25%、I0.25% + B和B + I0.1%具有相似的抗菌效果,但口腔内温度(B + I + T)降低了这些方案(无论NaOCl浓度如何)的效果。在SEM图像中也检测到了残留生物膜再定植。总之,使用0.25% NaOCl的机械和化学方法的所有组合对[具体微生物名称未给出]最有效。0.1% NaOCl的抗菌效果因干预顺序而异。口腔内温度影响消毒方案后的[具体微生物名称未给出]再定植。