Sosa Carlos, Alonso-Pérez-Chao Enrique, Ribas Carlos, Schelling Xavier, Lorenzo Alberto
Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 5;25(1):262. doi: 10.3390/s25010262.
The aim of this study was to understand and describe the physiological and biomechanical demands of various tasks used in basketball training and, subsequently, to provide a practical application of these tasks in a typical training week. Twelve basketball players had their external load variables monitored across 179 training sessions (2896 samples) using local positioning system technology. These variables included total distance covered, distance covered at various intensity levels, accelerations, decelerations, PlayerLoad™, and explosive efforts. The analysis revealed significant differences in both physiological and biomechanical loads across various drills. Specifically, tasks with more space and fewer defenders, such as 3v0 full court, impose higher physiological loads compared to tasks with less space and more defenders, like 5v5 full court. The difference in physiological load between these tasks was statistically significant ( < 0.05) with a moderate effect size (ES: -0.60, 95% CI: [-0.99, -0.22]). In terms of biomechanical load, drills with increased defensive pressure, such as 5v5 full court, exhibited significantly higher values compared to less specific drills, such as 5v0 full court, with a very large effect size (ES: 1.37, 95% CI: [1.04, 1.70], < 0.01). Additionally, comparisons between 5v5 full court and 3v0 full court for biomechanical load produced a very large effect size (ES: 1.67, 95% CI: [1.37, 1.97], < 0.01), indicating a substantial difference in load demands. The results indicate that tasks with more space and fewer defenders impose higher physiological loads, while those with less space and more defenders increase the biomechanical load. For training design, it is recommended to schedule tasks with a higher biomechanical load at the beginning of the session and those with a physiological orientation toward the end. Understanding the distinct demands of different drills can help coaches structure training sessions more effectively to optimize player load and performance development throughout the week.
本研究的目的是了解和描述篮球训练中各种任务的生理和生物力学需求,并随后在典型的训练周中对这些任务进行实际应用。12名篮球运动员在179次训练课(2896个样本)中使用局部定位系统技术监测其外部负荷变量。这些变量包括总距离、不同强度水平下的距离、加速度、减速度、球员负荷(PlayerLoad™)和爆发力。分析显示,不同训练项目的生理和生物力学负荷存在显著差异。具体而言,与空间较小且防守球员较多的任务(如全场5对5)相比,空间较大且防守球员较少的任务(如全场3对0)施加更高的生理负荷。这些任务之间的生理负荷差异具有统计学意义(<0.05),效应大小适中(ES:-0.60,95%CI:[-0.99,-0.22])。就生物力学负荷而言,防守压力增加的训练项目(如全场5对5)与针对性较低的训练项目(如全场5对0)相比,显示出显著更高的值,效应大小非常大(ES:1.37,95%CI:[1.04,1.70],<0.01)。此外,全场5对5和全场3对0在生物力学负荷方面的比较产生了非常大的效应大小(ES:1.67,95%CI:[1.37,1.97],<0.01),表明负荷需求存在显著差异。结果表明,空间较大且防守球员较少的任务施加更高的生理负荷,而空间较小且防守球员较多的任务增加生物力学负荷。对于训练设计,建议在训练课开始时安排生物力学负荷较高的任务,而在结束时安排侧重于生理方面的任务。了解不同训练项目的独特需求有助于教练更有效地安排训练课,以优化球员在整个星期的负荷和表现发展。