Olthof Sigrid B H, Tureen Tahmeed, Tran Lam, Brennan Benjamin, Winograd Blair, Zernicke Ronald F
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Exercise and Sport Science Initiative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Dec 15;3:670018. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.670018. eCollection 2021.
Basketball games and training sessions are characterized by quick actions and many scoring attempts, which pose biomechanical loads on the bodies of the players. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) capture these biomechanical loads as PlayerLoad and Inertial Movement Analysis (IMA) and teams collect those data to monitor adaptations to training schedules. However, the association of biomechanical loads with game performance is a relatively unexplored area. The aims of the current study were to determine the statistical relations between biomechanical loads in games and training with game performance. Biomechanical training and game load measures and player-level and team-level game stats from one college basketball team of two seasons were included in the dataset. The training loads were obtained on the days before gameday. A three-step analysis pipeline modeled: (i) relations between team-level game stats and the win/loss probabilities of the team, (ii) associations between the player-level training and game loads and their game stats, and (iii) associations between player-level training loads and game loads. The results showed that offensive and defensive game stats increased the odds of winning, but several stats were subject to positional and individual performance variability. Further analyses, therefore, included total points [PTS], two-point field goals, and defensive rebounds (DEF REB) that were less subject to those influences. Increases in game loads were significantly associated with game stats. In addition, training loads significantly affected the game loads in the following game. In particular, increased loads 2 days before the game resulted in increased expected game loads. Those findings suggested that biomechanical loads were good predictors for game performance. Specifically, the game loads were good predictors for game stats, and training loads 2 days before gameday were good predictors for the expected game load. The current analyses accounted for the variation in loads of players and stats that enabled modeling the expected game performance for each individual. Coaches, trainers, and sports scientists can use these findings to further optimize training plans and possibly make in-game decisions for individual player performance.
篮球比赛和训练的特点是动作迅速且有许多得分尝试,这会给球员身体带来生物力学负荷。惯性测量单元(IMU)将这些生物力学负荷作为球员负荷和惯性运动分析(IMA)进行捕捉,各球队收集这些数据以监测对训练计划的适应性。然而,生物力学负荷与比赛表现之间的关联是一个相对未被探索的领域。本研究的目的是确定比赛和训练中的生物力学负荷与比赛表现之间的统计关系。数据集中包括了一支大学篮球队两个赛季的生物力学训练和比赛负荷测量数据,以及球员层面和球队层面的比赛数据统计。训练负荷是在比赛日前一天获取的。采用了一个三步分析流程进行建模:(i)球队层面比赛数据统计与球队胜负概率之间的关系;(ii)球员层面训练和比赛负荷与其比赛数据统计之间的关联;(iii)球员层面训练负荷与比赛负荷之间的关联。结果表明,进攻和防守比赛数据统计增加了获胜的几率,但有几项数据统计受位置和个人表现差异的影响。因此,进一步的分析纳入了总得分[PTS]、两分球投篮命中数和防守篮板(DEF REB),这些数据受上述影响较小。比赛负荷的增加与比赛数据统计显著相关。此外,训练负荷对接下来比赛中的比赛负荷有显著影响。特别是,比赛前两天负荷的增加导致预期比赛负荷增加。这些发现表明,生物力学负荷是比赛表现的良好预测指标。具体而言,比赛负荷是比赛数据统计的良好预测指标,比赛日前两天的训练负荷是预期比赛负荷的良好预测指标。当前的分析考虑了球员负荷和数据统计的变化,从而能够为每个个体建模预期比赛表现。教练、训练师和体育科学家可以利用这些发现进一步优化训练计划,并可能针对球员的个人表现做出赛中决策。