Kaczmarczyk Katarzyna, Płoszczyca Kamila, Jaskulski Karol, Czuba Miłosz
Faculty of Rehabilitation, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Marymoncka 34, 00-968 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Applied and Clinical Physiology, Collegium Medicum University of Zielona Gora, Licealna 9, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 31;14(1):174. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010174.
: This study sought to assess how body mass (BM) and body composition in post-COVID-19 elderly adults were affected by 8 weeks of resistance training. An additional goal was to determine the agreement between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in elderly people. : Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention Group, which engaged in 8 weeks of resistance training, and a Control Group, which was advised to maintain their usual activity levels. Before and after the intervention, the body composition was analyzed via the BIA and DXA methods. : We found no statistically significant changes in BM or body composition following resistance training. BIA was found to overestimate the participants' baseline BM and fat-free mass (FFM) and to underestimate the fat mass (FM), compared to the DXA method. There were no significant differences in intervention-induced changes in FM and FFM measured by BIA and DXA. : Moderate intensity resistance training lasting 8 weeks was not found to be a sufficient stimulus to improve BM and body composition in post-COVID-19 elderly adults. We also conclude that BIA may serve as a viable alternative to DXA for measuring longitudinal changes in body composition in elderly people.
本研究旨在评估8周的抗阻训练对新冠康复后老年人群体重和身体成分的影响。另一个目标是确定生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和双能X线吸收法(DXA)在老年人身体成分测量中的一致性。参与者被随机分为干预组和对照组,干预组进行为期8周的抗阻训练,对照组则被建议保持其日常活动水平。干预前后,通过BIA和DXA方法对身体成分进行分析。我们发现抗阻训练后,体重或身体成分没有统计学上的显著变化。与DXA方法相比,BIA高估了参与者的基线体重和去脂体重(FFM),低估了脂肪量(FM)。BIA和DXA测量的FM和FFM在干预引起的变化方面没有显著差异。未发现持续8周的中等强度抗阻训练足以改善新冠康复后老年人群的体重和身体成分。我们还得出结论,BIA可作为DXA的可行替代方法,用于测量老年人身体成分的纵向变化。