• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者双联抗血小板治疗与替奈普酶安全性及有效性的比较

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy versus tenecteplase in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Jiang Xinzhao, Yuan Ruozhen, Ye Jiawei, Wang Xu, Shi Zongjie, Guo Shunyuan

机构信息

Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Hangzhou Medical College, School of Basic Medical Sciences and Forensic Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):1685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85969-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-85969-1
PMID:39799228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11724843/
Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus tenecteplase in minor non-disabling acute ischemic stroke. This retrospective observational study utilized data from our stroke database. All consecutive patients with minor non-disabling acute ischemic stroke treated with either DAPT or tenecteplase between January 2020 and June 2023 were included in the analysis. Of the 62 patients included in the analysis, the median (IQR) age was 66 (58-76) years, and 21 patients (34%) were female. Compared with patients receiving DAPT, those treated with tenecteplase were had higher NIHSS score at treatment (median [IQR], 4 [2-5] vs. 1 [1-2]; P = 0.01). At 90 days, 74.2% of patients (23/31) in the DAPT group and 71.0% (22/31) in the tenecteplase group had an excellent functional outcome (P = 0.78). Lower proportion of patients with minor bleeding events in DAPT group than tenecteplase group (3.2% [1/31] vs. 25.8% [8/31], P = 0.01). The findings in this study show that patients presenting with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset, dual antiplatelet treatment was similar to intravenous tenecteplase with regard to excellent functional outcome at 90 days. However, more proportion of patients with bleeding events treated with tenecteplase.

摘要

评估双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)与替奈普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中的安全性和有效性。这项回顾性观察研究使用了我们卒中数据库中的数据。分析纳入了2020年1月至2023年6月期间接受DAPT或替奈普酶治疗的所有连续性轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者。在纳入分析的62例患者中,年龄中位数(四分位间距)为66(58 - 76)岁,21例患者(34%)为女性。与接受DAPT的患者相比,接受替奈普酶治疗的患者在治疗时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分更高(中位数[四分位间距],4[2 - 5] vs. 1[1 - 2];P = 0.01)。在90天时,DAPT组74.2%(23/31)的患者和替奈普酶组71.0%(22/31)的患者获得了良好的功能结局(P = 0.78)。DAPT组发生轻微出血事件的患者比例低于替奈普酶组(3.2%[1/31] vs. 25.8%[8/31],P = 0.01)。本研究结果表明,对于症状发作4.5小时内出现轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中的患者,在90天时双抗血小板治疗与静脉注射替奈普酶在获得良好功能结局方面相似。然而,接受替奈普酶治疗的患者发生出血事件的比例更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/53e54bcb698f/41598_2025_85969_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/3776722f364e/41598_2025_85969_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/2306d8ef3c1c/41598_2025_85969_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/53e54bcb698f/41598_2025_85969_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/3776722f364e/41598_2025_85969_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/2306d8ef3c1c/41598_2025_85969_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f19/11724843/53e54bcb698f/41598_2025_85969_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy versus tenecteplase in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke.轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者双联抗血小板治疗与替奈普酶安全性及有效性的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):1685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85969-1.
2
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
3
Intravenous thrombolysis versus dual antiplatelet therapy in minor ischemic stroke within the thrombolytic window (TAMIS): a multicenter cohort study.溶栓窗内小面积缺血性卒中静脉溶栓与双联抗血小板治疗的比较(TAMIS):一项多中心队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Oct;57(7):1172-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03032-8. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial.双联抗血小板与阿替普酶治疗小卒中伴与不伴大血管闭塞患者早期神经功能恶化:ARAMIS 试验的预设事后分析。
Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
5
Sex Differences in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Alteplase for Patients with Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the ARAMIS Study.双重抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者的性别差异:ARAMIS研究的二次分析
CNS Drugs. 2024 Aug;38(8):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01096-x. Epub 2024 May 28.
6
Dual antiplatelet therapy versus intravenous tissue plasminogen activator with acute minor ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.急性小缺血性卒中双联抗血小板治疗与静脉内组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗:安全性和疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Jul;33(7):107704. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107704. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
7
Combining Intravenous Thrombolysis and Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the READAPT Study Cohort.联合静脉溶栓和双联抗血小板治疗对轻型缺血性卒中患者的影响:READAPT 研究队列的倾向性匹配分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e036275. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036275. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
8
Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.静脉溶栓后轻型缺血性卒中患者的早期双联抗血小板治疗。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Oct;33(10):107903. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107903. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase in Adult Patients with Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性轻度缺血性脑卒中成人患者双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Aug;57(6):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-02994-z. Epub 2024 May 9.
10
Analysis of Prescriptions for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中后双联抗血小板治疗处方分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2224157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24157.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the ACT Randomized Clinical Trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗大血管闭塞性卒中患者的安全性和有效性:ACT 随机临床试验的预先设定的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Aug 1;80(8):824-832. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2094.
2
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
3
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage With Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CERTAIN) Collaboration.
症状性颅内出血与替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:急性缺血性脑卒中常规替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较效果(CERTAIN)协作组。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):732-738. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1449.
4
The efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价、成对比较和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Feb;55(2):322-338. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02730-5. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.加拿大急性缺血性脑卒中静脉内替奈普酶与阿替普酶比较(AcT):一项实用的、多中心、开放标签、与登记系统相关联、随机化、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 16;400(10347):161-169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Vitamin K Antagonists versus Rivaroxaban in Hemodialysis Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.维生素 K 拮抗剂与利伐沙班在血液透析伴房颤患者中的安全性和疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1474-1483. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020111566. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Distributional Validity and Prognostic Power of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in US Administrative Claims Data.国立卫生研究院卒中量表在美国行政索赔数据中的分布有效性和预后能力。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 May 1;77(5):606-612. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.5061.
9
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中患者早期管理指南:2019年对2018年急性缺血性卒中早期管理指南的更新
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3331-3332. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027708. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
10
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.