Tao Yuchun, Cao Yiyin, Xu Lijun, Shi Jiaxuan, Leng Lei, Yang Hongbin, Zhai Tiemin, Huang Weidong
School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jan 12;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02332-8.
Given the recent update of SF-6Dv2, detailed data on utility scores for cancer patients by cancer type remain scarce in China and other regions, which limits the precision of cost-utility analyses (CUA) in cancer interventions. The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate utility scores of six common cancers in China measured using SF-6Dv2, and identify the potential factors associated with utility scores.
A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from August 2022 to December 2023. It recruited 896 cancer patients from three tertiary hospitals in China, including 270 with lung cancer, 96 with stomach cancer, 88 with liver cancer, 71 with oesophagus cancer, 142 with colorectum cancer, and 160 with breast cancer. The validated Simplified Chinese version of the SF-6Dv2 was used to calculate utilities based on the Chinese value set, and the utility values were described using the mean and standard deviation (SD). Participants' socio-demographic, behavioral and clinical characteristics were also obtained from the survey. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were performed to explore the impact of these three categories of characteristics on utility scores derived from SF-6Dv2 for the total cancer patients and each cancer group.
The mean utility score was 0.66 (SD = 0.26) for the total cancer sample, 0.66 (SD = 0.25) for lung cancer, 0.75 (SD = 0.23) for stomach cancer, 0.69 (SD = 0.24) for liver cancer, 0.69 (SD = 0.24) for oesophagus cancer, 0.65 (SD = 0.31) for colorectum cancer, and 0.57 (SD = 0.24) for breast cancer. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that patients who were older, from larger families, under greater economic pressures, undergoing fewer health examinations, smoking, and in advanced cancer stages had lower utility scores in the total cancer sample (p<0.05), with variations observed across different cancer types.
This study is one of the first to apply the SF-6Dv2 to a heterogeneous group of cancer patients, providing evidence for conducting CUA with SF-6Dv2 across six common cancers in China. In addition, the study provides a basis for improving interventions for different cancer types.
鉴于SF - 6Dv2的最新更新,中国及其他地区关于按癌症类型划分的癌症患者效用评分的详细数据仍然稀缺,这限制了癌症干预措施成本效用分析(CUA)的精确性。本研究的目的是系统评估在中国使用SF - 6Dv2测量的六种常见癌症的效用评分,并确定与效用评分相关的潜在因素。
于2022年8月至2023年12月进行了一项基于医院的横断面调查。该调查从中国三家三级医院招募了896名癌症患者,其中包括270名肺癌患者、96名胃癌患者、88名肝癌患者、71名食管癌患者、142名结直肠癌患者和160名乳腺癌患者。使用经过验证的中文版SF - 6Dv2,根据中国的值集计算效用,并使用均值和标准差(SD)描述效用值。还从调查中获取了参与者的社会人口统计学、行为和临床特征。进行单变量和多变量线性回归模型,以探讨这三类特征对总癌症患者和各癌症组从SF - 6Dv2得出的效用评分的影响。
癌症样本总体的平均效用评分为0.66(SD = 0.26),肺癌为0.66(SD = 0.25),胃癌为0.75(SD = 0.23),肝癌为0.69(SD = 0.24),食管癌为0.69(SD = 0.24),结直肠癌为0.65(SD = 0.31),乳腺癌为0.57(SD = 0.24)。多变量线性回归分析表明,年龄较大、来自大家庭、经济压力较大、健康检查较少、吸烟以及处于癌症晚期的患者在总癌症样本中的效用评分较低(p<0.05),不同癌症类型之间存在差异。
本研究是首批将SF - 6Dv2应用于异质性癌症患者群体的研究之一,为在中国对六种常见癌症进行SF - 6Dv2的CUA提供了证据。此外,该研究为改进针对不同癌症类型的干预措施提供了依据。