Burry Lisa D, Williamson David R, Detsky Michael E, Bernard Francis, Foster Jennifer, Mehta Sangeeta, Pinto Ruxandra, Scales Damon C, Rose Louise
Department of Pharmacy, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Pharmacy Département, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Research Center, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Chest. 2025 May;167(5):1397-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.030. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Delirium is a common and serious syndrome of acute brain dysfunction associated with negative outcomes. Melatonin may have a role in delirium prevention for critically ill adults based on data from noncritically ill patient populations. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial testing the hypothesis that low-dose melatonin prevents delirium in adults who are critically ill.
Does low-dose melatonin prevent delirium in critically ill adults?
We conducted this 3-arm feasibility trial in 3 tertiary academic ICUs. Included participants were ≥ 18 years of age, confirmed free of delirium at enrollment, and anticipated to require a > 48-hour ICU stay. We randomized participants to nightly melatonin 0.5 mg, 2 mg, or placebo. Feasibility outcomes were protocol adherence and recruitment rates. Our primary feasibility target was ≥ 85% (± 5% margin of error) of drug doses administered as per protocol. Secondary objectives were to explore adverse drug effects, melatonin pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes.
We screened 2,259 patients and excluded 1,863 patients (82.5%), resulting in 396 eligible patients, of whom 71 provided consent, for a recruitment rate of 0.8 patients/mo/site. Median age was 60.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-67 years), and median admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 7 (IQR, 3-10). Percentage drug administration protocol adherence per patient was a median of 100% (IQR, 92.3%-100%) or a mean of 88.7% (SD, 24.4%). Twenty-five protocol violations occurred, with no differences between groups. Fourteen patients (20%) experienced delirium during the study period and 25 patients (36%) experienced subsyndromal delirium, with no differences between study groups. No serious adverse effects were detected.
Our trial protocol comparing 2 low doses of melatonin and placebo for delirium prevention in critically ill adults demonstrated feasibility for protocol adherence. However, trial eligibility rates were modest primarily because of delirium being present or the inability to screen. Consent rates also were low. This finding suggests that conducting delirium prevention trials that require delirium to be absent on enrollment is particularly challenging in the ICU.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02615340; URL: www.
gov.
谵妄是一种常见且严重的急性脑功能障碍综合征,与不良后果相关。基于非危重症患者群体的数据,褪黑素可能在预防危重症成人谵妄方面发挥作用。我们的目的是评估一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验的可行性,该试验检验低剂量褪黑素可预防危重症成人谵妄这一假设。
低剂量褪黑素能否预防危重症成人的谵妄?
我们在3个三级学术重症监护病房(ICU)进行了这项三臂可行性试验。纳入的参与者年龄≥18岁,入组时确认无谵妄,且预计在ICU停留时间>48小时。我们将参与者随机分为每晚服用0.5毫克褪黑素组、2毫克褪黑素组或安慰剂组。可行性结果为方案依从性和招募率。我们的主要可行性目标是按照方案给药的药物剂量≥85%(±5%误差范围)。次要目标是探索药物不良反应、褪黑素的药代动力学和临床结局。
我们筛查了2259例患者,排除了1863例患者(82.5%),最终有396例符合条件的患者,其中71例提供了同意书,招募率为0.8例/月/中心。中位年龄为60.5岁(四分位间距[IQR],48 - 67岁),入院时序贯器官衰竭评估评分中位数为7(IQR,3 - 10)。每位患者的药物给药方案依从率中位数为100%(IQR,92.3% - 100%)或平均为88.7%(标准差,24.4%)。发生了25次方案违规,各治疗组之间无差异。14例患者(20%)在研究期间发生谵妄,25例患者(36%)发生亚综合征性谵妄,各研究组之间无差异。未检测到严重不良反应。
我们比较2种低剂量褪黑素和安慰剂预防危重症成人谵妄的试验方案显示了方案依从性的可行性。然而,试验符合条件率较低,主要原因是存在谵妄或无法进行筛查。同意率也较低。这一发现表明,在ICU进行要求入组时无谵妄的谵妄预防试验特别具有挑战性。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT02615340;网址:www. ClinicalTrials.gov