Suppr超能文献

通过五个国家关于标准、实施和执行的公开信息来了解非洲药品监管与采购之间的关系。

Understanding the regulatory-procurement interface for medicines in Africa via publicly available information on standards, implementation, and enforcement in five countries.

作者信息

Kohler Jillian C, Castro-Arteaga Mariangela, Panjwani Saher, Mukanga David, Lumpkin Murray M, Fundafunda Bonface, Kapeta Anthony B, Chamdimba Chimwemwe, Wong Anna S Y, Harper Kristin N, Preston Charles

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 9;18(1):2436898. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2436898. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substandard and falsified medicines in Africa are a major public health concern. Access to quality medical products in African countries is governed in large part by two major entities at the national level: the regulatory authority and the procurement agency. The importance of national regulators in ensuring quality medical products is well known. The interplay between the national regulator and the national procurement agency also has a significant impact on access to quality medicines but is less understood. This study's aim was to characterise the regulatory-procurement interface - the intersection of decision-making in these two spheres - using publicly available data from five African countries.

METHODS

For the five target countries, we adapted criteria from WHO's 2018 to identify key national policies and practices around the nexus of medicines regulation and procurement.

RESULTS

Though legal and policy frameworks enabling best practices in procurement were often in place, implementation and enforcement of these practices appear to be key areas for strengthening. In addition, we documented a lack of publicly available information related to the role that quality plays in selecting medical products. Finally, none of the five countries have publicly published the results of their selection decisions with key product details, making it difficult to assess whether basic quality standards are being met.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, one of the most important next steps for improving the effectiveness and transparency of national procurement is for procurement agencies to publish detailed quality selection criteria and an up-to-date list of the medical products they have purchased, with key product information. We hope these findings can help inform the conversation about implementing and enforcing best practices at the regulatory-procurement interface, with the goal of improving access to quality versions of medical products in Africa and globally.

摘要

背景

非洲的不合格和假冒药品是一个重大的公共卫生问题。非洲国家获得优质医疗产品在很大程度上由国家层面的两个主要实体管理:监管机构和采购机构。国家监管机构在确保医疗产品质量方面的重要性是众所周知的。国家监管机构与国家采购机构之间的相互作用对优质药品的获取也有重大影响,但人们对此了解较少。本研究的目的是利用来自五个非洲国家的公开数据,描述监管 - 采购界面——这两个领域决策的交叉点。

方法

对于五个目标国家,我们采用了世界卫生组织2018年的标准,以确定围绕药品监管与采购关系的关键国家政策和做法。

结果

尽管支持采购最佳做法的法律和政策框架通常已经到位,但这些做法的实施和执行似乎是需要加强的关键领域。此外,我们记录了缺乏与质量在选择医疗产品中所起作用相关的公开信息。最后,五个国家中没有一个公开公布其选择决定的结果以及关键产品细节,这使得难以评估是否达到了基本质量标准。

结论

基于这些发现,提高国家采购有效性和透明度的最重要的下一步措施之一是采购机构公布详细的质量选择标准以及他们所采购医疗产品的最新清单,并附上关键产品信息。我们希望这些发现有助于为在监管 - 采购界面实施和执行最佳做法的讨论提供信息,目标是改善非洲和全球获得优质医疗产品的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验